![]() |
|
---|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
|
To compete effectively in a global economy, aluminum casting operations must develop and maintain a qualified and competent workforce. A significant part of this effort must center on employee training, especially safety training. In addition to providing employees with accurate information, effective safety training programs will recognize certain principles governing human behavior. This paper reviews topical content appropriate for safety training programs to be used in aluminum casting operations and suggests ways to enhance the effectiveness of such training by incorporating principles of human behavior.
Statistics gathered by the Aluminum Association spanning a period of two decades shows that, every year, workers are injured in accidents involving molten aluminum.1 Though the causes vary, many accidents result from unsafe acts that have been repeated all too often. Numerous factors contribute to repetition of unsafe behavior, including lack of knowledge, experience, training, management, supervision, and communication. In rare cases, willful disregard for safety rules is at fault.2
One gauge of the success of safety training is the degree to which employees
comply with safety rules. Unless employees have a personal commitment to work
safely, constant surveillance will be required to ensure compliance with those
rules.
There is a difference between following safety rules and working safely. Well-written
safety rules define specific behaviors that protect personnel from accident and
injury. When personnel are working safely, they not only follow safety rules but
are fully aware of the hazards of the work place and are on the alert for potential
accidents.
A CAST HOUSE TRAINING GUIDE |
||
|
||
|
Effective safety programs are founded upon principles that acknowledge the
important roles of both management and employees.
Managers or owners are responsible for all facets of corporate endeavor, including
safety, and must assume full responsibility for its success or failure. Since
management sets the tone, management must be genuinely committed to safety and
establishing it as a top priority. Lip service to safety at the management level
counteracts safety objectives at all other levels. Nothing will destroy employee
commitment to abiding by safety rules quicker than observing a manager or owner
violate them. Management is also responsible for formulating the safety policy.
This policy should give simple verbal expression to the companys fundamental
belief in and commitment to safety. Examples include, No job is so urgent
that it cannot be done safely, or Safety is everybodys business,
or Safety RULES. Every employee should know what the companys
safety policy is. Of equal importance to having a safety policy is consistently
living by the principle it portrays. Failure to do so will undermine the safety
effort.
Because employee attitudes tend to reflect management attitudes, a positive
management attitude toward the workforce will be reflected in the manner with
which workers assume their responsibilities on the production floor. This applies
to working safely just as much as it does to producing a quality product.
People are naturally concerned with their own safety and will often be willing
to participate in the safety effort. In some cases, employee participation in
the safety effort may be a condition of employment. Participation breeds ownership.
To maximize that ownership, employees can be involved in a variety of ways,
including regular participation on a safety committee; working on a taskforce
to solve a safety-related problem; participating in a safety audit; researching
a safety issue and reporting on it to the safety committee; and periodically
rotating the safety committee chairmanship.
Safety training must not be permitted to become the sole format for the safety
effort. Although training is important, safety programs must be far more encompassing
to be effective. In addition to training, effective safety programs include
Wise managers recognize the value of a credible instructor. A credible instructor is one who thoroughly understands the subject matter and, preferably, has first-hand experience. Corporate trainers who fall short of this standard may find themselves challenged by veteran cast-house personnel who will discount instructions given by anyone who doesnt have first-hand experience with molten metal. If credible and proficient instructors are not available in-house, they may be brought in from the outside.
Training is defined as guiding the development of a person; to instruct
so as to make proficient or qualified; to teach. For optimal results,
training must also embrace exercise, indoctrination, experience, and grounding.3
All too often, training consists merely of observing another person perform
a job for a period of time, or on-the-job training. On-the-job training focuses
on performing tasks rather than developing understanding. Since different people
commonly perform jobs differently, on-the-job training often transfers to the
new employee not only the good habits, but also the bad habits, including unsafe
practices, of the senior worker.
Prior to receiving any on-the-job training, the employee should receive fundamental
training in the principles, processes, and hazards of the work that he or she
will be performing. Afterwards, a proficiency test serves the dual purposes
of measuring retention and documenting that the person received training. Points
missed on the test can be later reviewed to clear up misunderstandings and ensure
that critical information has been understood.
Fundamental instruction should be followed by hands-on familiarization with
pertinent equipment without molten metal being present. By going through the
job motions while under the supervision of a qualified trainer, the employee
can demonstrate retention of fundamental job knowledge. Actually performing
job functions over a period of time develops skill. This can be done with the
aid of a co-worker whose proficiency in the job has been demonstrated previously.
Only new employees who have demonstrated that they can perform the job functions
properly and safely should be permitted to perform the work on their own. Periodic
follow-up with the new employee should be conducted over a period of weeks to
ensure that job skills have been mastered and retained.
A pyramid of knowledge, behavior, and commitment may illustrate the accumulated
benefits of a well-conceived and effectively administered safety-training program.
At the foundation lies knowledge. Safe behavior is made possible by knowledge
of job-related hazards and rules of safe conduct. Commitment to working safely
comes with time and job experience. Commitment cannot be forced or mandated,
but is an inward personal resolve. Commitment to work safely will be strengthened
as the principles of human behavior referred to earlier are acknowledged and
incorporated into the safety program. See the sidebar for specific training
objectives, methods, and program topics.
After initial training has been provided and personnel are working
in their assigned areas, it will be necessary to periodically review some fundamentals
so that job practices do not wander from those prescribed. This fact can be
attested to by anyone who has worked in aluminum cast shops. In particular,
it is important to be reminded of the potential hazards that molten aluminum
presents. One way to reinforce this fact is by viewing videos showing the aftermath
of aluminum explosions and reviewing prevention methods being employed.
It must also be remembered that rotating personnel from one job assignment to
another may require retraining. This fact is sometimes overlooked when employees
have previously worked in the job or may be somewhat familiar with the work
by virtue of proximity.
Each time training is administered, it should be documented and acknowledged
by the employee in writing. Keeping written tests on file also certifies that
employees have received the requisite training.
1. Seymour
G. Epstein, Update on Molten Aluminum Incident Reporting, Light
Metals 1997, ed. R. Huglen (Warrendale, PA: TMS,
1997), pp. 887897.
2. Warren S. Peterson, Safety
in the Aluminum Cast ShopThe Operator Factor, Light Metals 1989,
ed. P.G. Campbell (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1989),
pp. 963967.
3. Websters
New World Dictionary
4. Guidelines for Handling
Molten Aluminum, Second Edition (Washington, D.C.: The
Aluminum Association).
5. Guidelines for Aluminum
Sow Casting and Charging (Washington, D.C.: The
Aluminum Association).
6. Guidelines for Aluminum
Scrap Receiving and Inspection Based on Safety and Health Considerations
(Washington, D.C.: The Aluminum Association).
7. Warren S. Peterson, Safety
in the Aluminum Cast Shop, Light Metals 1989, ed. P.G. Campbell
(Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1989), pp. 963968.
8. J. Martin Ekenes, Fostering
a Safety Culture, Light Metals 1993, ed. S.K. Das (Warrendale,
PA: TMS, 1993), pp. 883887.
9. Warren S. Peterson, Molten
AluminumAmmonium Nitrate Explosions, Light
Metals 1997, ed. R. Huglen (Warrendale, PA: TMS,
1997), pp. 11951198.
J. Martin Ekenes is with Hydro Aluminum Hycast in Spokane, Washington.
For more information, contact J.M. Ekenes, Hydro Aluminum Hycast, Spokane, Washington; e-mail jmekenes@mstar2.net
Direct questions about this or any other JOM page to jom@tms.org.
If you would like to comment on the November 2001 issue of JOM, simply complete the JOM on-line critique form | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Search | TMS Document Center | Subscriptions | Other Hypertext Articles | JOM | TMS OnLine |