The scalable fabrication of nanostructured materials with complex morphologies and tailorable chemistries remains a significant challenge. One strategy for such synthesis consists of the generation of a solid structure with a desired morphology (a "preform"), followed by reactive conversion of the preform into a new chemistry. Several gas/solid and liquid/solid reaction processes that are capable of such chemical conversion into new micro-to-nanostructured materials, while preserving the macroscopic-to-microscopic preform morphologies, are described in this overview. Such shape-preserving chemical transformation of one material into another could be considered a modern type of materials "alchemy."
INTRODUCTION
Scalable fabrication protocols for the syntheses of structures with functional chemistries and complex morphologies that can be tailored over various length scales (even down to the nanoscale) may have a significant impact in a variety of current or potential applications. One paradigm for such fabrication involves separation of the processes for structure formation and for chemical tailoring; that is, a solid structure (a "preform") of a given chemistry may first be fabricated with desired macro-to-nanoscale morphological features,
and then converted into a new chemistry via morphology-preserving gas/solid or liquid/solid reaction(s). The extensive literature available on the kinetics and phase evolution associated with such reactions in the field of high temperature oxidation/corrosion provides a rich source of mechanistic information that can be utilized for such materials "alchemy."
HOW WOULD YOU... |
…describe the overall significance
of this paper?
Scalable processes are needed
for fabricating complex threedimensional
(3-D) nanostructured
components with tailored
chemistries for numerous
applications. This paper describes
how 3-D micro-to-macroscopic
preforms, generated by scalable
biological or synthetic methods,
may be converted into new
nanostructured materials with
desired chemistries and properties
via shape-preserving reactions.
…describe this work to a
materials science and engineering
professional with no experience in
your technical specialty?
Reactive gases and liquids can be
used to transform complex 3-D
metal- or ceramic-rich preforms
into new ceramics, metals, or
ceramic/(inter)metallic composites,
while retaining the preform shapes
and dimensions. Displacement
reactions (oxidation-reduction or
metathetic) and oxidation reactions
are described for generating
near net-shaped nanostructured
materials for chemical, electrical,
optical, structural, and thermal
applications.
…describe this work to a
layperson?
The medieval “art of transmuting
metals” (alchemy) was aimed at
converting common materials into
precious ones. This paper describes
how certain materials, formed
into complex shapes by common
biological or synthetic methods,
can be transformed by chemical
reactions into new materials
with attractive properties, while
retaining the starting shapes. Such
a modern type of materials alchemy
can yield a variety of advanced
components, such as microscopic
gas sensors. effi cient fi lters for
purifying water, and erosionresistant
rocket nozzles. |
The purpose of this overview is to provide examples of the following three reaction-based approaches for the chemical conversion of shaped solid preforms: gas/solid displacement reactions, liquid/solid displacement reactions, and gas/solid oxidation reactions. Under appropriate conditions, each of these reaction-based approaches can be used to transform solid preforms into new nanostructured materials while preserving the preform morphology (note: a "nanostructured material" refers herein to a material with one or more physical features, such as a phasesize, crystal size, and/or pore size, with a dimension below one micrometer). The syntheses of two types of shaped, nanostructured materials will be discussed here: microscopic structures with nanoscale features (generated via the application of gas/solid displacement reactions to solid microscopic preforms), and macroscopic structures with nanoscale phase and/or crystal sizes (generated via the application of liquid/solid displacement reactions, or gas/solid oxidation reactions, to solid macroscopic preforms).
CONVERSION OF MICROSCOPIC PREFORMS BY GAS/SOLID REACTIONS
Given the capability of gases to readily migrate through fine-scale pores or to penetrate into narrow cavities of high aspect ratio, gas/solid displacement reactions can be effective means of introducing new chemistries to complex-shaped, nanostructured, three-dimensional (3-D) oxide-based templates. Such displacement reactions have been used to convert intricate microscopic synthetic or biologically derived oxide preforms into a variety of other functional oxide, metal, or oxide/metal composite materials while retaining the morphology and nanoscale features of these starting preforms.
Biologically Replicable, 3-D, Microscale, Nanostructured Preforms: Diatom Frustules
Among the most complex-shaped, three-dimensional (3-D) nanostructured oxide templates available for the application and evaluation of shape-preserving gas/solid displacement reactions are the silica-based microshells (frustules) generated by diatoms. Diatoms are single-celled algae that populate a wide variety of aquatic environments.1,2 Each diatom species generates an amorphous silica frustule with a particular 3-D shape and patterned nanoscale features (e.g., pores, channels, protuberances of 101–102 nm size), which suggests a strong degree of genetic control over the silica formation process.1,3 Such species specificity (genetic control) of the diatom frustule morphology enables enormous numbers of similarly shaped frustules to be generated via sustained culturing (repeated doubling) of a single diatom species4 (e.g., 80 reproduction cycles from a single parent diatom cell can yield 280, or more than one trillion trillion, daughter cells with frustules of similar morphology). Furthermore, the 104–105 extant diatom species possess frustules with a spectacular variety of intricate 3-D morphologies.1 Future genetic engineering of diatoms may allow for a wide range of tailored 3-D shapes.3 The precise (down to nanoscale), hierarchical (nano-to-microscale), complex (3-D), reproducible (genetically-controlled), and scalable (massively-parallel reproduction) nature of diatom microshell assembly under ambient conditions, coupled with the wide variety of selectable (and, in the future, perhaps tailorable) morphologies among extant diatom species, make diatom frustules unique and highly attractive as templates for synthetic chemical conversion into microscale nanostructures for potential devices applications (with a future potential for "Genetically Engineered Microdevices").5–9
Oxide, Oxide/Metal, and Metal Replicas via Oxidationreduction Displacement Reactions
The first demonstration of the use of a gas/solid displacement reaction to convert a nanostructured 3-D oxide microparticle (i.e., a silica diatom frustule) into an entirely new oxide composition, while retaining the microparticle morphology, was reported in 2002.7 Diatom frustules were exposed to magnesium vapor (generated by heating solid magnesium granules) at 900°C for 4 h to allow for a net magnesiothermic displacement reaction (Reaction 1), where {Si} refers to Si dissolved within a Mg-Si alloy liquid. (Note that all reactions are given in Table I.) Because the Mg:SiO2 reactant ratio was maintained at a value well above the 2:1 molar ratio required by the stoichiometry of Reaction 1, the excess magnesium vapor continued to react with the silicon product to generate a magnesium-silicon liquid (note: the eutectic temperature for magnesium-rich compositions in the Mg-Si system is only 638°C10). This Mg-Si alloy liquid poured out of the reacted frustules to yield MgO-based structures that retained the 3-D frustule morphology and patterned pores (Figure 1).5,7 This magnesiothermic process has also been used to convert "biosculpted" silica structures into magnesia replicas.11 The exposure of a silica-precipitating peptide, derived from the silaffin-1A protein of the diatom Cylindrotheca fusiformis, to a tetramethylorthosilicate precursor solution under a linear shear flow condition resulted in the formation of interwoven microfilamentary silica fibrils. Upon reaction with magnesium gas at 900°C, the silica microfilaments were converted into nanocrystalline magnesium oxide replicas that retained the microfilamentary shape and fine (submicrometer) features.11 Nanocrystalline magnesia in the form of such intricate porous 3-D microparticles (available in a wide variety of shapes as diatom frustules) or 2-D microfilamentary structures can be attractive for use in environmental (e.g., for heavy metal precipitation from, or neutralization of, acidic wastewater streams; for SO2(g) removal from gaseous emissions), chemical/petrochemical (e.g., as an acid acceptor, filler, or thickening catalyst in the production of plastics), pharmaceutical (e.g., in cosmetics and ointments), or agricultural (e.g., in fertilizers, as a carrier for pesticides, in livestock feed) applications.12–16
The gas/solid magnesiothermic reaction of an oxide template may also be used to generate a nanocrystalline elemental replica of the template. By lowering the magnesiothermic reaction temperature to 650°C, and by reducing the molar Mg:SiO2 reactant ratio to a value just above that required by the stoichiometry of Reaction 1, the formation of an Mg2Si compound and the Mg-Si alloy liquid were suppressed, so that nanocrystalline MgO/Si composite replicas of diatom frustules were formed, as indicated by Reaction 2.17–21 The products of this reaction correspond to a co-continuous, nanocrystalline mixture of MgO (65.1 vol.%) and Si (34.9 vol.%). Owing to the continuity of the Si phase, porous Si replicas of the diatom frustules have been produced by selective acid dissolution of the interconnected MgO network.21 As revealed in Figure 2, the 3-D frustule morphology and features as small several tens of nanometers were well-preserved in the resulting nanocrystalline Si replicas. The Si frustule replicas possessed a much higher specific surface area (>500 m2/g) than the starting SiO2 frustules,and contained a high population of nanoscale (<2 nm diameter) pores.21 Such a single porous silicon frustule replica was found to act as a rapid, sensitive, low-voltage, and minimally invasive gas sensor (Figures 2g and h).21 This now-patented8,9,22,23 shape-preserving magnesiothermic reduction process has also recently been used to convert synthetic mesoporous silica films and colloidal silica assemblies into porous silicon replicas.24–26 Such nanocrystalline porous silicon replica structures, generated from biosilica or synthetic silica templates, can be attractive for a number of chemical, biochemical, electrical, and optical applications (e.g., for sensing, biocatalysis, batteries, and photovoltaics).21,24–29 Szczech and Jin30 have subsequently reported that Mg2Si-bearing diatom frustule replicas generated by this magnesiothermic conversion process may be useful for thermoelectric applications (note: the formation of such solid Mg2Si, relative to solid Si or Mg-Si liquid products, may be controlled by adjustment of the Mg:SiO2 reactant ratio at modest temperatures20,21).
Oxide Replicas via Metathetic (Halide) Displacement Reactions
Metathetic gas/solid displacement reactions, involving halide gases, have also been utilized for the shape-preserving conversion of intricate 3-D silica microparticles, ordered porous silica films, and silica microspheres into nanocrystalline replicas comprised of other oxides.31–36 For example, the exposure of diatom SiO2 frustules to TiF4 gas, generated by the vaporization of solid TiF4, has been used to transform the frustules into titanium oxyfluoride, TiOF2(s), according to a metathetic displacement reaction (Reaction 3).31,32 Initial experiments conducted at 500–700°C with molar TiF4:SiO2 reactant ratios >4.9:1 resulted in reactive evaporation and disintegration of the silica frustules (Figures 3a–c).31,32 Such reactive silica evaporation (a type of active corrosion37,38) at such modest temperatures indicated that a volatile Si-O-bearing gas species had formed. Hexafluorodisiloxane gas, Si2OF6(g), is one such likely species that can form by Reaction 4. The apparent formation of Si2OF6(g), and the associated vaporization of the SiO2 template, was avoided by conducting the metathetic reactive conversion at lower temperatures (i.e., 180–350°C) and at lower molar TiF4:SiO2 reactant ratios (<2.4:1).31–34 Under these conditions, the SiO2 reactive evaporation was suppressed and the TiOF2 product formed on the SiO2 frustule surfaces (i.e., analogous to a transition from active to passive corrosion37,38). Complete reaction then yielded nanocrystalline TiOF2 structures that retained the SiO2 frustule shape and fine features.31–33 Such TiOF2 replicas were then converted into nanocrystalline anatase TiO2-based replicas (Figures 3d and e) via reaction with humid oxygen at ≥600°C as shown in Reactions 5a and 5b,32,33 where TiO2–aF2a(s) refers to fluorine-doped anatase titania. The open nanocrystalline nature of these anatase microparticles, along with the retention of a controlled amount of fluorine (via tailoring of the humid oxygen treatment), enabled these doped titania replicas to act as effective agents for the rapid hydrolytic destruction of pesticides (methyl paraoxon and methyl parathion) in water without the need for UV light.33 This patented shape-preserving metathetic reaction process8,9,22 has also been used to convert opalescent 3-D porous silica preforms into nanocrystalline titania structures that retained the general morphology and structural features of the preforms.35 Given the chemical, biochemical, optical, and electrical properties of titania, the ability to convert 3-D silica microparticles, ordered opalescent films, microspheres, or other silica-derived morphologies into nanocrystalline titania replicas can be quite attractive for generating sensitive, minimally-invasive gas detectors (e.g., for CO(g) or H2(g)), efficient photocatalysts (e.g., for the reaction of detergents or dyes in water), indextailored waveguides (e.g., for visible or near IR wavelengths), controlled-shape pigment particles (e.g., for paints, paper, plastics, ink, and cosmetics), nanostructured medical implants (e.g., as biocompatible coatings for bone implants), efficient antimicrobial agents (e.g., for killing E. coli bacteria), and highly-porous electrodes (e.g., for dyesensitized solar cells).39–44
Further Chemical Modification of Replicas via Coating and/or Additive Reactions
The new oxide chemistries of replica structures generated by gas/solid displacement reactions can enable the coating of these replicas with additional functional oxides (i.e., so as to yield multilayered and/or multicomponent replicas). Consider, for example, the syntheses of BaTiO3-based coatings on shaped microtemplates (e.g., intricate microparticles, porous inverse opals, or patterned films). Such templated Ba-TiO3-based structures can be attractive for electronic (e.g., capacitor, varistor), electrochemical (e.g., gas sensing), thermal (e.g., temperature sensing), or optical (e.g., phosphor) applications.45–47 However, BaTiO3 is not thermochemically compatible with SiO2; that is, the deposition of a Ba-Ti-O-bearing coating on a SiO2 template, followed by thermal treatment to allow for conversion of the coating into crystalline BaTiO3, tends to result in the formation of undesired silicate compounds (e.g., BaTiSiO5, BaTiSi2O7, BaTiSi3O948). Fortunately, MgO replicas of SiO2 templates are chemically compatible with BaTiO3.49 Furthermore, because nanocrystalline magnesia surfaces can be readily hydroxylated, magnesia templates are attractive for reaction with, and binding of, alkoxide precursors used in sol-gel deposition processes. Weatherspoon et al.50–52 have demonstrated the efficacy of such a combined magnesiothermic reaction and sol-gel coating approach by generating BaTiO3 coatings on MgO diatom frustule replicas. After magnesiothermic conversion of silica frustules at 900°C for 1.5 h, the magnesia frustule replicas were immersed in a heated aqueous NaOH solution. The resulting hydroxylated magnesia replicas were then exposed to a refluxed solution of barium titanium ethylhexanoisopropoxide in ethanol at 70°C. After evaporation of the volatile components of the solution at 56°C, the coated frustules were heated in air to 700°C for 1.5 h to allow for organic pyrolysis and crystallization of the coating. The resulting frustules contained a thin (150 nm), continuous, and conformal coating of nanocrystalline BaTiO3
(average crystal size of 20 nm). Indeed,
the coating was sufficiently continuous
as to yield freestanding BaTiO3 frustule
replicas upon selective dissolution
of the underlying MgO template.52 A
similar react-and-coat process has also
used by these authors to synthesize
photoluminescent Eu-doped BaTiO3-
bearing frustule replicas.51
Nanostructured elemental replicas
of shaped oxide templates, generated
through a magnesiothermic reduction
(displacement reaction) process, may
also be used as templates for subsequent
electroless deposition of other
functional elements. The coating of
relatively noble metals (Au, Ag, Pd) on
porous nanostructured templates can
be attractive for a number of catalytic
(e.g., for CO(g) oxidation, fuel cell catalysts),
electrochemical (e.g., sensors),
electronic (e.g., electrodes), thermal
(e.g., cryogenic heat exchangers), and
other applications.53–55 While the direct
electroless deposition of noble metal
coatings on silica templates is inhibited
by the insulating nature of this oxide,
porous silicon replicas possess appropriate
electronic and chemical (reducing)
characteristics for such deposition.
Bao et al.56 have recently synthesized
nanocrystalline noble metal replicas of
3-D silica microparticle templates (diatom
frustules) by first converting the
silica into porous silicon (via magnesiothermic
reduction), and then applying
metal coatings onto/within the porous
silicon via subsequent electroless
deposition. Subsequent selective dissolution
of the Si in an aqueous NaOH solution
then yielded freestanding porous
Ag, Au, or Pd structures that retained
the 3-D morphology of the starting silicon
frustule replicas (Figure 4).56 The
frustule-shaped silver, gold, and palladium
microparticles possessed average
crystal sizes of only 14, 50, and 43 nm,
respectively.
Oxide replicas of patterned templates,
generated via metathetic gas/solid displacement
reactions, can also be used
as reactive templates for the generation
of functional multicomponent oxides.
For example, nanocrystalline titania
replicas produced by the reaction of
silica templates with titanium tetrafluoride
gas (using Reactions 3, 5a, and 5b)
have been converted into barium titanate
(BaTiO3) replicas through hydrothermal
reaction by Ernst, et al.52,57 The
titania replicas were sealed, along with
barium hydroxide octahydrate and water,
inside a Teflon chamber and then
heated to 100°C for 48 h to allow for
hydrothermal conversion into barium
titanate. The resulting frustule-shaped
particles were found to be comprised
of nanocrystalline BaTiO3 with an average
crystal size of only 63 nm.52,57
CONVERSION OF MACROSCOPIC PREFORMS BY LIQUID/SOLID REACTIONS
Several liquid/solid displacement reaction-
based approaches have been developed
to allow for the conversion of
shaped, macroscopic, ceramic-bearing
preforms into composites comprised of
new ceramic and metallic or intermetallic
products that retain the shapes and
dimensions (to within 1%) of the starting
preforms. Under appropriate conditions,
these approaches have yielded
composites with micrometer-to-submicrometer
phase and/or crystal sizes. Two general categories of such liquid/
solid displacement reaction-based processes
are reactive metal penetration
and reactive casting. Reactive metal
penetration refers to the conversion of a
dense, shaped ceramic-bearing preform
into a dense product, comprised of new
ceramic and metallic or intermetallic phases, via the inward migration of a
liquid/solid reaction front through the
dense preform.58–69 Reactive casting
refers to the conversion of a porous,
shaped ceramic-bearing preform into
a dense ceramic/metallic or ceramic/
intermetallic composite via the infiltration
(with or without the assistance
of an applied pressure) of a metallic
liquid through the porous preform and
reaction of this liquid with one or more
solid phases in the preform.70–85
Reactive Metal Penetration
A common displacement reaction
used in reactive metal penetration is
shown in Reaction 6,58–60 where {Si}
refers to silicon dissolved within an aluminum-
silicon melt. With this process,
dense amorphous SiO2 preforms, which
may be readily fabricated into complicated
shapes through conventional
glass forming methods, are immersed
in a bath of molten Al at ≥1,000°C. The
reaction of a silica preform with molten
aluminum (Reaction 6) proceeds by the
formation of an Al2O3-bearing reaction
zone that migrates through the preform
at a linear rate (on the order of 1–5 mm/
h) at 1,000–1,200°C.59 The volume of
2 moles of Al2O3(s) is substantially
less than the volume of 3 moles of
SiO2(s). Hence, this reaction-induced
volume reduction generates space that
is accommodated by the molten metal.
The silicon product of this displacement
reaction can dissolve into the
molten metal and then diffuse into the
excess surrounding aluminum bath at
≥1,000°C.59 Upon cool down, the resulting
composites are comprised of a
fine mixture of interpenetrating Al2O3
and Al-rich phases (Figures 5a and b).
(Note: owing to the continuity of both
phases, this reactive metal penetration
process has also been referred to as
the co-continuous ceramic composite,
or C4, process by Breslin, Daehn, and
colleagues, who pioneered this approach.
58–61) An interesting microstructural
characteristic of such composites
is the growth texture of the alumina
product phase; that is, the c-axis of the
α-Al2O3 phase is strongly aligned with
the direction of migration of the reaction
front.61 This reactive metal penetration
process yields co-continuous Al2O3/Al-rich
composites that retain the shape
and dimensions (to within 1%) of the
starting dense SiO2 preforms (Figure
5c).58–61 Reactive metal penetration has
also been used to convert dense aluminosilicate
(e.g., mullite, Al6Si2O13; sillimanite,
Al2SiO5) preforms into dense,
near net-shape, co-continuous composites
of Al2O3 and Al-rich alloy (or
Al-rich alloy + Si).62–64 The values of
specific modulus (62–86 GPa·cm3/g),
hardness (8–12 GPa), toughness (5–10
MPa·m1/2), and thermal conductivity
(80 WK–1m–1), and the wear behavior
reported for these lightweight (3.4–3.7
g/cm3) Al2O3/Al-bearing composites
make such reaction-formed materials
attractive for applications such as automotive disk brake rotors and calipers,
internal combustion engine piston
crowns, turbine compressors, and
cylinder liners.58–62,65 The thermal and
mechanical performance of such cocontinuous
composites have been further
tailored through modifications of
the preform and melt chemistries. For
example, the reaction of shaped preforms
comprised of mixtures of SiC
and SiO2 with an Al-Si alloy melt has
yielded SiC/Al2O3/Al-based composites
with enhanced thermal conductivity,
thermal shock resistance, and wear
resistance.60,65 The continuous metallic
phase has also been modified by
immersing shaped Al2O3/Al-bearing
composites in a second bath of another
metal alloy to allow for chemical alteration
via liquid phase diffusion and
exchange. For example, such a liquid
exchange process has been used to
generate composites with continuous
Cu-Al-Fe, Fe-Al, or Ni-Al phases for
higher temperature applications.60,61,66
The average size of the oxide and
metal colonies within co-continuous
alumina/aluminum-bearing composites
formed by reactive metal penetration of
silica-bearing or mullite-bearing preforms
at 1,000–1,200°C is typically
several micrometers, although a significant population of submicrometer sized
ligaments has also been observed.59,64,67
The oxide and metal colony size can be
appreciably reduced, however, through
alloying additions to the molten aluminum.
For example, Strange and
Breslin,68 and Evarts69 have reported
that the introduction of copper into the
aluminum melt has a dramatic impact
on the scale of the microstructure of
composites formed by reactive metal
penetration. These authors immersed
dense amorphous SiO2 preforms into
Cu-Al melts comprised of 30–63 at.%
(50–80 wt.%) Cu at 1,100–1,150°C.
The rates of linear penetration for these
copper-aluminum alloy melts into the
silica preforms were lower than for
pure molten aluminum. Dramatic reductions
in the colony sizes of the
co-continuous oxide and intermetallic
(AlCu, Al2Cu) phases were observed
for melts with ≥50 at.% Cu (Figures
6a–d). The nanostructured Al2O3/AlCu/
Al2Cu composites were also found to
exhibit substantially higher values of
hardness than microstructured Al2O3/
AlCu/Al2Cu composites.69 Yoshikawa
et al.66 have reported that the reactive
metal penetration of molten Fe-Al alloys
into dense amorphous SiO2 rods at
1,200–1,300°C yielded co-continuous,
nanocrystalline Al2O3/FexAly composites.
66 With increasing iron content in
the melt (from 5–30 at.% Fe), the rate
of reactive metal penetration into the
silica preform decreased and composites
with iron-aluminum intermetallic
phases of higher iron content were
generated (i.e., predominantly Al3Fe
for a 20 at.% Fe melt vs. predominantly
Al5Fe2 for a 30 at.% Fe melt).66
Reactive Casting
Reactive casting of molten metals or
alloys into porous ceramic-bearing preforms
has also been used to generate
near net-shaped composites comprised
of new ceramic (e.g., Al2O3, MgO,
MgAl2O4, ZrC, HfC) and metallic (e.g.,
Al, Mg-Al, Fe-Ni-Al, Fe-Ni-Cr, Fe-Cr-
Al, Ni-Co-Cr-Al, W) or intermetallic
(e.g., NbAl3, Nb2Al, TiAl3, Ti(Al,Si)3,
NiAl, Ni3Al, FeAl) phases.58,60,70–85
Prior to such reactive casting, a reactant-
bearing powder or powder mixture,
containing appropriate ceramic or
ceramic and metal constituents, is first
shaped into a rigid preform of desired
morphology and porosity. Preforms of complex morphology have been prepared
by a variety of methods, including
slip or gel casting, green machining,
powder injection molding, or rapid
prototyping approaches.79,80,85 Some
firing of the preform is typically conducted
prior to pressureless reactive
infiltration to allow for some particle
necking in the preform (for sufficient
rigidity to avoid shape distortion during
reactive casting) and to obtain a
desired level of preform porosity. Indeed,
the final phase content of composites
generated by reactive casting
may be tailored by adjusting the porosity,
as well as the phase content, of
the shaped rigid preform. Consider, for
example, the net liquid/solid displacement
Reactions 7a, 7b, 8, and 9,70–80
where {Al}, {Mg}, and {Zr} refer to
aluminum, magnesium, and zirconium
present within a melt. Like for Reaction
6, displacement Reactions 7a and
7b generate oxide products that possess
a smaller volume than the oxide
reactant (e.g., the volume of 2 moles of
α-Al2O3 is 9.3% smaller than the volume
of 3 moles of rutile TiO286). Such a
reaction-induced reduction in the internal
solid oxide volume, coupled with
the starting open pore volume of the
rigid preform, provides the space required
to accommodate the formation
of the solid titanium aluminide product
(via the reactive casting approach
known as the infiltration alumina aluminide
alloy, or i-3A, process70–72). By
tailoring the starting preform porosity,
the aluminum content of the aluminide
phase (e.g., TiAl3 vs. TiAl) and the relative
amount of aluminide in the final
dense composite may be adjusted.70–72
Displacement Reactions 8 and 9, on
the other hand, generate more ceramic
volume than is consumed (e.g., the volume
of 3 moles of MgO is 32% larger
than the volume of 1 mole of α-Al2O3).
Such a reaction-induced increase in the
internal solid volume within a reacting,
rigid preform can be used to generate
ceramic/metal or ceramic/intermetallic
composites with relatively high
ceramic contents (via the reactive casting
approach known as the displacive
compensation of porosity, or DCP, process73–
80). Indeed, electrically-insulating
MgO/Mg-Al composites comprised
of ≥83 vol.% MgO have been produced
by such a reactive casting process; that
is, sufficient metallic liquid was extruded
out of the rigid specimen during
reactive conversion of Al2O3 into
MgO (Reaction 8) that the remaining
entrapped metallic (Al-Mg) phase was
discontinuous.73 Because the partially
sintered (necked) preforms remain rigid
during such reactive infiltration, porous
preforms of complex shape, fabricated
by gel casting,79 green machining,80
or three-dimensional printing,80 have
been converted into dense ceramic-rich
products that retain the shapes and dimensions
(to within 1%) of the starting
porous preforms (Figure 7a–c).
The sizes of ceramic and metal or
intermetallic phases generated within
reactively cast composites can be appreciably
refined through the use of
fine-scale reactant phases in the starting
porous preforms, rapid molten
metal infiltration at a modest temperature,
and modest post-infiltration heat
treatment.71,72,82 For example, Al2O3/
Ti(Al,Si)3-based composites with phase
sizes of a few micrometers to submicrometers
have been produced by: i)
attrition milling of a mixture of fine
Al2O3 (1.2 μm ave. size) and TiO2 (0.5
μm ave. size) powders, ii) compacting
and sintering the powder mixture for
0.5 h at 1,150°C (to generate a rigid
preform with a porosity of 49 vol.%),
iii) rapid squeeze casting (within a
few seconds) of a molten Al-Si alloy
at 700°C into the porous preform, and
then iv) annealing of the resulting infiltrated preform for 3 h at 800°C.72,82
While the as-cast specimen contained
unreacted TiO2, Al, and Si phases and
no apparent Ti(Al,Si)3 product (as determined
from x-ray diffraction analysis),
the subsequent 800°C/3 h thermal
treatment resulted in complete conversion
of the as-cast specimen into an intimate
mixture of Al2O3 and Ti(Al,Si)3.
Such fine-scale, reactively cast, near
net-shape Al2O3/Ti(Al,Si)3 composites
possessed fracture strengths (4 point
bending) of 490–540 MPa, fracture
toughness (by indentation) values of
5.0–8.6 MPa·m1/2, and hardness values
of 5.7–7.4 GPa.72,82 A similar approach
(milling of fine oxide/metal powders,
partial sintering, rapid squeeze casting,
and modest annealing after casting) has
been used to fabricate near net-shaped
metal matrix composites (Fe-Ni-Cr-based
or Ni-Co-Cr-Al-based) reinforced
with nanoscale Al2O3 filaments
(via the reactive casting approach
known as the infiltration Metal Matrix
Composite process81–85). The fracture strengths of reactively cast Fe-Ni-Crbased
alloy composites reinforced with
nanoscale Al2O3 at 550°C and 900°C
were found to be almost twice the values
of a similar reference metal alloy
lacking the alumina phase.83 A derivative
of such reactive casting ("in-situ" or "short-distance" infiltration82,85,87,88),
involving local aluminum melting and
brief reaction within attrition-milled
oxide/metal mixtures under an applied
pressure, has also been used to synthesize
dense metal alloy matrix composites
reinforced with interconnected
Al2O3 filaments of a few hundred nanometers
thickness. Such Fe-Cr-Ni alloy/
nanofi lamentary Al2O3 composites
have exhibited fracture strength and
fracture toughness values of 1,100 MPa
and 18 MPa·m1/2, respectively, in threepoint
bending.88
CONVERSION OF MACROSCOPIC PREFORMS BY GAS/SOLID REACTIONS
Two general oxidation-based approaches
that are capable of converting
shaped, macroscopic, freestanding,
solid metal-bearing preforms into
oxide products that retain the preform
shape with relatively little or no change
in dimensions (Figure 8) are the reaction
bonded metal oxide (RBMO) process,
and the volume identical metal
oxidation (VIMOX) process. (Note:
while the reaction bonded metal oxide,
RBMO, process is often referred to as
the reaction bonded aluminum oxide,
or RBAO, process, in light of the pioneering
work of Claussen et al.,89,93–100
the RBMO label is used herein, as this
process may be used to generate a variety
of metal oxides.)
Use of Oxidation-induced Volume Changes for Near Net-Shape Processing
For both of the patented RBMO89
and VIMOX processes,90,91 the volume
change(s) associated with oxidation
are used to partially or fully offset opposing
volume changes resulting from
other phenomena. Consider the oxide-to-metal volume ratios for several elements,
often referred to as the Pilling
Bedworth Ratio (PBR), presented in
Table II.92 For the elements in the left
half of Table II, the PBR values are
well in excess of unity (as is true for
most elements). For a solid, porous
preform containing one or more of
these elements (as well as perhaps other
constituents that exhibit an increase
in solid volume upon oxidation, such as
silicon carbide), the oxidation-induced
increase in solid volume may be offset
by the sintering-induced shrinkage during
post-oxidation annealing. Hence,
a shaped porous preform containing
tailored amounts of metal, ceramic,
and porosity may be converted, with
appropriate oxidation and sintering
treatments, into a dense all-oxide body
that preserves the preform shape with
relatively little or no net shrinkage. For
example, porous green-machined bodies
of Al, Al2O3, SiC, and ZrO2 have
been converted into dense composites
of Al6Si2O13 (mullite) and ZrO2 that
retain the preform shape and dimensions
(to within 1%).93 This is the basic
premise for near net-shape processing
by the RBMO method. The RBMO approach
has been extensively utilized to
generate low-shrinkage Al2O3-based
(e.g., Al2O3, Al2O3-ZrO2, Al2O3-ZrO2-Nb2O5) or Al6Si2O13(mullite)-based
(Al6Si2O13, Al6Si2O13-ZrO2, Al6Si2O13-SiC, Al6Si2O13-SiC-ZrO2) materials for applications requiring high stiffness,
strength, wear resistance, and modest
weight (e.g., gears, dies, punches, or
dental implants).94–101
For the alkali and alkaline earth elements
shown in the right half of Table
II, the PBR values are well below unity.
Such oxidation-induced reductions in
solid volume may be used to accommodate
volume expansions resulting from
the oxidation of other elements and/or
the formation of oxide compounds.
Hence, a shaped dense preform containing
tailored amounts of alkali or alkaline
earth elements and other metallic
and/or ceramic phases may be converted,
by appropriate oxidation and
post-oxidation annealing treatments,
into a dense all-oxide body that retains
the shape and dimensions of the preform.
For example, a compacted green
body of Ba, Sr, Al, Al2O3, and SiO2 has
been converted into a (Ba,Sr)Al2Si2O8
(celsian) body that retained the preform
shape and dimensions (to within
1%).102,103 This is the basic premise for
near net-shape processing by the VIMOX
approach. The VIMOX approach
has yielded a variety of near net-shaped,
functional, alkaline earth oxide-bearing
components (e.g., ferroelectric BaTiO3,
PTCR (Ba,Pb)TiO3, proton-conducting
BaCeO3, ferrimagnetic BaFe12O19, biocompatible
Ca6(PO4)10(OH)2, and refractory
MgAl2O4, BaAl2O4, and BaAl2Si2O8).102–115
Fabrication of Shaped, Metal-bearing Preforms
The fabrication of solid RBMO and
VIMOX preforms typically involves
the preparation of a powder mixture
comprised of desired metal and ceramic
phases, and then compaction and
forming of the powder mixture into a
green body of desired shape, porosity,
and strength. For both approaches,
preforms comprised of fine, intimate
mixtures of metal and ceramic phases
are required in order to obtain desired
oxidation and reaction kinetics. High-energy
ball milling can be an effective
means of preparing such fine, reactive
mixtures, although proper care needs to
be taken during such milling to avoid
undesired reactions (e.g., excessive oxidation
and hydration of metallic constituents,
formation of brittle intermetallic
compounds) and excessive incorporation
of wear debris from the milling
media and milling vessel into the
powder mixture. Proper optimization
of milling intensity (e.g., rotation speed
during attrition milling), ball-to-charge
ratio, starting oxide particle size, milling time, and milling fluid is required
to obtain metal/ceramic mixtures of desired
composition, phase content, and
phase size for subsequent compaction,
forming, and oxidation/reaction treatments.94–98,100,103,105,107,116,117 A sufficient
amount of ductile metal in the milled
powder mixture is required to allow for
uniform compaction and forming into a
green body of relatively high strength,
and to achieve the desired oxidation-induced
volume change(s) for shape and
dimension preservation. Compacted
RBMO and VIMOX powder mixtures
with ≥30 vol.% ductile metal can readily
be machined, using conventional
steel tooling, into intricately-shaped
green bodies.93,96,100,103,112,114,118 Metal-rich
alkaline-earth-bearing precursors
(e.g., with ≥60 vol.% metal) have also
been rolled into thin (down to 25 μm)
tapes or drawn into multifilamentary
(down to 250 nm diameter filaments)
wires.103,104,107,108,111,119,120
Oxidation Processing
The conversion of metal-bearing
RBMO and VIMOX green bodies into
shape-preserved, oxide-based bodies
of desired phase content and microstructure
requires the use of controlled
oxidation and post-oxidation annealing
treatments. Particular concerns associated
with the oxidation treatment
include: the generation of appreciable
metallic liquid due to incomplete oxidation
at subsolidus temperatures, and
thermal runaway (ignition) associated
with the exothermic nature of the oxidation
reactions.100,104,105,121,122 Excessive
metallic liquid formation (with or without
ignition) can lead to undesired agglomeration
and phase coarsening, an
uncontrolled change in preform composition
or porosity (due to the loss of
a nonwetting metallic liquid from the
preform), and/or a distortion in the preform
shape.100,104,108,111 Ignition can lead
to the extensive formation of defects
(cracks, pores) and geometric distortions
due to thermal stresses associated
with steep temperature gradients
and chemical stresses associated with
sharp compositional gradients.121,122
In the RBMO process, the oxidation
treatment is typically conducted with
a prolonged heat treatment (involving
a slow heating rate and/or an extended
isothermal anneal) below the melting
point of aluminum to allow for extensive
subsolidus oxidation.96–98,117 The
time required for such subsolidus aluminum
oxidation in the RBMO process
has been reported to depend upon the
amount of aluminum, the aluminum
particle size and the preform porosity
(which are affected by the milling
and compaction conditions), as well
as the preform size.98,117,121 In order to
dramatically shorten the required oxidation
time while avoiding ignition,
particularly for green bodies with relatively
large characteristic dimensions,
feedback control firing (using the rate
of specimen weight gain to control
heating), has successfully been applied
to RBAO green bodies.122 With PBR
values less then unity, porous (nonprotective)
oxide scales tend to form
on alkaline earth metals (Mg, Ca, Sr,
Ba) during oxidation at modest temperatures
(e.g., at 300–500°C), so that
the oxidation of VIMOX preforms can
occur at a relatively rapid rate at subsolidus
temperatures, even for green
bodies of low initial porosity.92,102–115
However, the thermally-insulating nature
of the resulting porous alkaline
earth oxides requires that a modest rate
of heating be used during subsolidus
oxidation to avoid ignition and the associated
thermal and chemical stresses
and defects/distortions.92,103,105,111,114
Post-oxidation Annealing
The subsolidus oxidation of VIMOX
preforms can yield fine nanocrystalline
oxide-bearing mixtures that, in turn,
can react with other metal or oxide
constituents in the preforms to generate
binary oxide compounds at low
temperatures. For example, the oxidation
of barium in air or oxygen at 300°C
yields a fine-grained peroxide, BaO2,
that reacts rapidly at modest temperatures with other metallic constituents to
yield binary oxide compounds (e.g., the
reaction of BaO2 with Al, Si, and Ti has
yielded BaAl2O4, Ba2SiO4, and Ba2TiO4,
respectively, at 300–550°C—well below
the melting points of Al, Si, and
Ti).103,105,106,109,113,124,125 Continued firing
and reaction of such oxidized VIMOX
preforms has yielded a variety of fully-reacted,
functional multicomponent
oxides at modest temperatures. For example,
dense tapes of the superconductor,
Bi2Sr2Ca1Cu2O8+x, and of the proton
conductor, Ba(Ce,Nd)O3, have been
produced from oxidized metal-rich
precursor tapes after firing at peak temperatures
of only 860°C and 900°C, respectively.103,126 Dense composites comprised
of alternating layers enriched in
fine (submicrometer thick) platelets of
superconducting YBa2Cu3O7-y and in
Ag have been generated via an oscillating
internal oxidation treatment of
Y-Ba-Cu-Ag metallic precursor tapes at
400–600°C followed by firing at a peak
temperature of 900°C.127 Intentionally
porous tapes of nanocrystalline doped
(Ba,Pb)TiO3 (a thermistor material with
a relatively high Curie temperature)
and ferrimagnetic BaFe12O19 have been
generated at 750°C and 900–1,080°C,
respectively.103,108,111RBMO preforms have also been
converted into dense, nanocrystalline
oxide-based materials. With proper
use of high-energy milling to obtain a
fi nely-divided, well-intermixed assemblage
of reactive metallic and ceramic
phases, with appropriate conditions of
compaction and oxidation, and with
the use of fine second phases to inhibit
grain growth during post-oxidation sintering,
dense RBMO composites have
been synthesized with submicrometer
grain sizes. For example, Claussen et
al.97 have reported the syntheses of reaction
bonded composites comprised of
55 vol.% mullite, 10 vol.% silicon carbide,
21 vol.% alumina, and 14 vol.%
zirconia with phase sizes well below 1
μm. The introduction of fine (0.2 μm
dia.) α-Al2O3 seeds to preform mixtures
to enhance the conversion of γ-Al2O3 (a
metastable alumina polymorph formed
during low-temperature aluminum oxidation)
into α-Al2O3, and to further refine the grain size of sintered reaction-bonded
alumina, has been suggested by
Suvaci and Messing.128 Mullite crystal
seeding to reduce the mullite grain size
in reaction-bonded mullite has also been
proposed by She et al.129 Fine-grained
reaction-bonded alumina has been reported
to exhibit superplastic-like behavior
at 1,250–1,500°C, which may
be utilized to generate dense, shaped,
nanocrystalline components, via sinter
forming or sinter forging, at appreciably
lower temperatures than for pressureless
sintering.97,101 Bourz et al.130 have
generated sinter-forged nanocrystalline
(0.63 μm ave. alumina grain size)
reaction-bonded alumina-zirconia composites
of >95% of theoretical density
at only 1,300°C. Such nanocrystalline,
reaction-bonded alumina-zirconia composites
have exhibited room temperature
fracture strengths (in biaxial bending)
of 1.1 GPa.130 Dense, fine-grained,
reaction-bonded alumina-zirconia composites
prepared by pressureless sintering
at 1,550°C have also exhibited
respectable room temperature fracture
strength and fracture toughness values
(in 4-point bending) of ≥700 MPa and
3.5 MPa·m1/2.96,100 Dense, fine-grained,
reaction-bonded mullite-silicon carbide-
alumina-zirconia composites
(with 49–55 vol.% mullite) prepared by
pressureless sintering at 1,550°C have
exhibited room temperature fracture
strength and fracture toughness values
(in 4-point bending) of 490–610 MPa
and 4.1–4.9 MPa·m1/2.97,99
CONCLUSIONS
As demonstrated in this overview,
nanostructured materials with complex
macroscopic-to-microscopic shapes
and with tailorable chemistries may be
fabricated by first generating a preform
with a desired morphology and then
chemically transforming the shaped
preform into a new material that retains
the preform morphology (a type
of materials "alchemy"). This fabrication
paradigm enables materials that
can be readily generated with complex
shapes (e.g., formable metal-rich compositions
for macroscale components
or biologically formed inorganic microscale
structures) to be used in the
preform fabrication step prior to chemical
transformation into the desired material.
Under appropriate conditions,
gas/solid and liquid/solid reactions can
then be used for the shape-preserving
conversion of such macroscopic-to-microscopic
solid preforms into chemically
tailored nanostructures with desired
properties. The identification of
reaction conditions that allow for such
shape-preserving conversion into new
nanostructured materials has been significantly aided by utilizing well-known
concepts and phenomena from the field
of high temperature corrosion (e.g., the
Pilling–Bedworth Ratio, active vs. passive
corrosion, ignition, internal oxidation).
Indeed, by taking the perspective
that fluid/solid reactions are a type of
"chemical processing", as opposed to a
type of "corrosion", this author is confident that scholars who are well-versed
in the prior mechanistic knowledge established
in the field of high temperature
corrosion will continue to develop
attractive reaction-based approaches for
synthesizing advanced nanostructured
materials with tailored morphologies,
chemistries, and properties.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
K.H.S. acknowledges the financial
support of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (Dr. Charles Lee, Dr. Hugh DeLong, and Dr. Joan Fuller, program managers) and the U.S. Department of Energy (Dr. Michael Markowitz, program manager).
REFERENCES
1. F.E. Round, R.M. Crawford, and D.G. Mann, The Diatoms. Biology and Morphology of the Genera (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990).
2. D.G. Mann, Phycologia, 38 (6) (1999), pp. 437–495.
3. M. Hildebrand, Chem. Rev., 108 (2008), pp. 4855–4874.
4. V. Martin-Jezequel, M. Hildebrand, and M.A. Brzezinski, J. Phycol., 36 (2000), pp. 821–840.
5. K.H. Sandhage et al., Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 2 (4) (2005), pp. 317–326.
6. R. Gordon, F.A.S. Sterrenburg, and K.H. Sandhage, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 5 (1) (2005), pp. 1–4.
7. K.H. Sandhage et al., Adv. Mater., 14 (6) (2002), pp. 429–433.
8. K.H. Sandhage, U.S. patent 7,067,104 (27 June 2006).
9. K.H. Sandhage, U.S. patent 7,204,971 (17 April 2007).
10. A.A. Nayeb-Hashemi and J.B. Clark, Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr., 5 (6) (1984), pp. 584–592.
11. M.B. Dickerson et al., J. Nanosci. Nanotech., 5 (1) (2005), pp. 63–67.
12. M.T. Frost et al., Trans. Inst. Mining Metall., 99 (1990), pp. C117–C124.
13. R. Kon and M. Miyazaki, Fragrance J., 31 (8) (2003), pp. 63–68.
14. J.J. Mortvedt and J.J. Kelsoe, Fert. Res., 15 (2) (1988) pp. 155–161.
15. Z. Xin, W.B. Tucker, and R.W. Hemken, J. Dairy Sci., 72 (2) (1989), pp. 462–470.
16. S. Spychaj and F.J. Balta Calleja, J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 12 (16) (1993), pp. 1255–1257.
17. Y. Cai et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88 (7) (2005), pp. 2005–2010.
18. M.S. Haluska et al., Powder Diff., 20 (4) (2005), pp. 306–310.
19. M.S. Haluska et al., Rev. Sci. Instr., 76 (2005), pp. 126101-1–126101-4.
20. S.M. Allan et al., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 26 (3) (2005), pp. 289–296.
21. Z. Bao et al., Nature, 446 (3) (2007), pp. 172–175.
22. K.H. Sandhage, U.S. patent 7,393,517 (1 July 2008).
23. K.H. Sandhage and Z. Bao, U.S. patent 7,615,206 (10 November 2009).
24. E.K. Richman et al., Nano Lett., 8 (9) (2008), pp. 3075–3079.
25. R.F. Shepherd et al., Adv. Mater., 20 (24) (2008), pp. 4734–4739.
26. M. Ibisate, D. Golmayo, and C. Lopez, Adv. Mater., 21 (28) (2009), pp. 2899–2902.
27. M. Bengtsson et al., Phys. Status Solidi A, 182 (2000), pp. 495–504.
28. H.-C. Shin et al., J. Power Sources, 139 (2005), pp. 314–320.
29. V. Pacebutas, K. Grigoras, and A. Krotkus, Phys. Scripta, T69 (1997), pp. 255–258.
30. J.R. Szczech and S. Jin, J. Solid State Chem., 181 (7) (2008), pp. 1565–1570.
31. R.R. Unocic et al., Chem. Comm., 7 (2004), pp. 795–796.
32. K.H. Sandhage et al., Handbook of Biomineralization, ed. P. Behrens and E. Bauerlein (Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, 2007), pp. 235–253.
33. S.-J. Lee et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 90 (5) (2007), pp. 1632–1636.
34. S. Shian and K.H. Sandhage, Rev. Sci. Instr., 80 (2009), pp. 115108/1–115108/7.
35. J.C. Lytle et al., Chem. Mater., 16 (20) (2004), pp. 3829–3837.
36. S. Shian et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 89 (2) (2006), pp. 694–698.
37. C. Wagner, J. Appl. Phys., 29 (9) (1958), pp. 1295–1298.
38. S.Y. Ip, M.J. McNallan, and D.S. Park, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 75 (7) (1992), pp. 1942–1048.
39. T. Hyodo et al., Chem. Sensors, 18 (2002), pp. 178–180.
40. M. Lanata et al., Opt. Mater., 17 (2001), pp. 11–14.
41. C.J. Barbe et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 80 (1997), pp. 3157–3171.
42. M. Manso et al., Biomater., 23 (2002), pp. 349–356.
43. G. Fu, P.S. Vary, and C.-T. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (18) (2005), pp. 8889–8898.
44. J.H. Braun, J. Coatings Technol., 69 (868) (1997), pp. 59–72.
45. A.B. Alles, V.R.W. Amarakoon, and V.L. Burdick, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 72 (1) (1989), pp. 148–151.
46. M. Viviani et al., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 21 (10-11) (2001), pp. 1981–1984.
47. M.A.R.C. Alencar et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 84 (23) (2004), pp. 4753–4755.
48. D.E. Rase and R. Roy, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 38 (11) (1955), pp. 389–395.
49. R.S. Roth et al., J. Solid State Chem., 104 (1) (1993), pp. 99–118.
50. M.R. Weatherspoon et al., Chem. Commun., (5) (2005), pp. 651–653.
51. M.R. Weatherspoon et al., J. Electrochem. Soc., 153 (2) (2006), pp. H34–H37.
52. Y. Cai et al., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 27 (8) (2007), pp. 49–56.
53. R. Zeis et al., J. Power Sources, 165 (1) (2007), pp. 65–72.
54. D. Ding and Z. Chen, Adv. Mater., 19 (15) (2007), pp. 1996–1999.
55. R.W. Ertenberg, B. Andraka, and Y. Takano, Phys. B, 284-288 (2000), pp. 2022–2023.
56. Z. Bao et al., Adv. Mater., 21 (4) (2009), pp. 474–478.
57. E.M. Ernst et al., J. Mater. Res., 22 (5) (2007), pp. 1121–1127.
58. M.C. Breslin, U.S. patent 5,214,011 (25 May 1993).
59. M.C. Breslin et al., Mater. Sci. Eng., A195 (1995), pp. 113–119.
60. G.S. Daehn and M.C. Breslin, JOM, 58 (11) (2006), pp. 87–91.
61. E. del Rio et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 463 (2007), pp. 115–121.
62. R.E. Loehman, K. Ewsuk, and A.P. Tomsia, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 79 (1) (1996), pp. 27–32.
63. W.G. Fahrenholtz et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 79 (9) (1996), pp. 2497–2499.
64. Y. Gao et al., J. Mater. Sci., 31 (1996), pp. 4025–4032.
65. M.Y. Chen and M.C. Breslin, Wear, 249 (10-11)(2001), pp. 868–876.
66. N. Yoshikawa, A. Hattori, and S. Taniguchi, Mater. Sci. Eng., A342 (2003), pp. 51–57.
67. V.S.R. Murthy et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88 (10) (2005), pp. 2902–2907.
68. A.C. Strange and M.C. Breslin, U.S. patent 5,728,638 (17 March 1998).
69. J.S. Evarts, M.S. Thesis, The Ohio State University (2008).
70. C. Scheu et al., Phys. Stat. Sol. A, 166 (1998), pp. 241–255.
71. F. Wagner et al., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 19 (1999), pp. 2449–2453.
72. P. Beyer, R. Janssen, and N. Claussen, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2 (11) (2000), pp. 734–737.
73. P. Kumar and K.H. Sandhage, J. Mater. Sci., 34 (23)(1999), pp. 5757–5769.
74. K.A. Rogers et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 82 (3) (1999), pp. 757–760.
75. K.H. Sandhage and P. Kumar, U.S. patent 6,407,022 (18 June 2002).
76. M.B. Dickerson, R.L. Snyder, and K.H. Sandhage, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 85 (3) (2002), pp. 730–732.
77. K.H. Sandhage et al., U.S. patent 6,598,656 (29 July 2003).
78. K.H. Sandhage and P. Kumar, U.S. patent 6,833,337 (21 December 2004).
79. M.B. Dickerson et al., J. Mater. Sci., 39 (19) (2004), pp. 6005–6015.
80. D.W. Lipky et al., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., accepted, in press.
81. N. Claussen et al., European patent 1,252,349, German patent 10,047,384 (9 August 2001).
82. P. Kumar et al., Scripta Mater., 44 (2001), pp. 751–757.
83. T. Selchert, R. Janssen, and N. Claussen, Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 24 (4) (2003), pp. 175–180.
84. T. Selchert, R. Janssen, and N. Claussen, Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 25 (1-3) (2004), pp. 459–464.
85. R. Janssen, S. Scheppokat, and N. Claussen, J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 28 (2008), pp. 1369–1379.
86. JCPDS International Center for Diffraction Data File 43-1484 for Al2O3, 21-1276 for TiO2, 45-946 for
MgO, 35-0784 for ZrC, 25-1047 for WC, 4-0806 for W (JCPDS International Center for Diffraction Data, Newtown Square, PA, 2007).
87. N. Travitsky et al., Adv. Eng. Mater., 5 (4) (2003), pp. 256–259.
88. N. Travitsky et al., Mater. Sci. Eng., A344 (2003), pp. 245–252.
89. N. Claussen, U.S. patent 5,607,630 (4 March 1997).
90. K.H. Sandhage, U.S. patent 5,318,725 (7 June 1994).
91. K.H. Sandhage, U.S. patent 5,447,291 (5 September 1995).
92. N.B. Pilling and R.E. Bedworth, J. Inst. Met., 29 (1923), pp. 529–591.
93. D. Holz et al., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 16 (1996), pp. 255–260.
94. N. Claussen, T. Le, and S. Wu, J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 5 (1989), pp. 29–35.
95. N. Claussen, N.A. Travitsky, and S. Wu, Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 11 (1990), pp. 806–820.
96. S. Wu, D. Holz, and N. Claussen, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76 (4) (1993), pp. 970–980.
97. N. Claussen, S. Wu, and D. Holz, J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 15 (1994), pp. 97–109.
98. D. Holz et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 77 (10) (1994), pp. 2509–2517.
99. S. Wu and N. Claussen, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 77 (11) (1994), pp. 2898–2904.
100. R. Janssen and N. Claussen, Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 22 (3) (2001), pp. 51–58.
101. M. Reiterer, T. Kraft, and H. Riedel, J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 24 (2004), pp. 239–246.
102. S.M. Allameh and K.H. Sandhage, J. Mater. Res., 13 (5) (1998), pp. 1271–1285.
103. K.H. Sandhage et al., Mater. & Manuf. Proc., 15 (1) (2000), pp. 1–28.
104. M.M. Antony and K.H. Sandhage, J. Mater. Res., 8 (11) (1993), pp. 2968–2977.
105. H.J. Schmutzler, M.M. Antony, and K.H. Sandhage, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 77 (3) (1994), pp. 721–729.
106. H.J. Schmutzler and K.H. Sandhage, Metall. Trans. B, 26B (1995), pp. 135–148.
107. H.J. Schmutzler, K.H. Sandhage, and J.C. Nava, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 79 (6) (1996), pp. 1575–1584.
108. G.A. Ward and K.H. Sandhage, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 80 (6) (1997), pp. 1508–1516.
109. S.M. Allameh and K.H. Sandhage, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 80 (12) (1997), pp. 3109–3126.
110. P. Kumar and K.H. Sandhage, J. Mater. Res., 13 (12) (1998), pp. 3423–3435.
111. S.M. Allameh and K.H. Sandhage, J. Mater. Res., 14 (11) (1999), pp. 4319–4328.
112. D.H. Viers and K.H. Sandhage, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 82 (1) (1999), pp. 249–252.
113. R. Citak, K.A. Rogers, and K.H. Sandhage, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 82 (1) (1999), pp. 237–240.
114. E. Saw et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 83 (4) (2000), pp. 998–1000.
115. E. Saw et al., Mater. & Manuf. Proc., 15 (1) (2000), pp. 29–46.
116. M.J. Watson et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 81 (8) (1998), pp. 2053–2060.
117. E. Suvaci and G.L. Messing, J. Mater. Sci., 34 (13) (1999), pp. 3249–3261.
118. K.H. Sandhage and N. Claussen, The Encyclopedia of Materials Science and Technology, Volume 9, ed. K.H.J. Buschow et al. (New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, 2001), pp. 8035–8040.
119. L.J. Masur et al., JOM, 46 (12) (1994), pp. 28–30.
120. K.H. Sandhage et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 79 (7) (1996), pp. 1839–1850.
121. S. Gaus et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 82 (4) (1999), pp. 909–915.
122. M.J. Watson et al., Acta Mater., 49 (6) (2001), pp. 1095–1103.
123. M.J. Watson et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88 (12) (2005), pp. 3380–3387.
124. X-D. Zhang, K.H. Sandhage, and H.L. Fraser, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 81 (11) (1998), pp. 2983–2997.
125. X.D. Zhang, K.H. Sandhage, and H.L. Fraser, J. Mater. Res., 13 (11) (1998), pp. 3122–3134.
126. T.J. Detrie and K.H. Sandhage, J. Mater. Res., 15 (2) (2000), pp. 306–316.
127. K.H. Sandhage, J. Electrochem. Soc., 139 (6) (1992), pp. 1661–1671.
128. E. Suvaci and G.L. Messing, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 84 (3) (2001), pp. 657–659.
129. J. She et al., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 22 (2002), pp. 323–328.
130. M.M.R. Boutz et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, A233 (1997), pp. 155–166.
Kenneth H. Sandhage is the B. Mifflin Hood Professor in the School of Materials Science and Engineering, and Adjunct Professor in the School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, at the Georgia Institute of Technology, 771 Ferst Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332; (404) 894-6882; e-mail: ken.sandhage@mse.gatech.edu. |