The automotive product design and
manufacturing community is continually
besieged by Herculean engineering,
timing, and cost challenges. Nowhere is
this more evident than in the development
of designs and manufacturing processes
for cast aluminum engine blocks and
cylinder heads. Increasing engine performance
requirements coupled with
stringent weight and packaging constraints
are pushing aluminum alloys
to the limits of their capabilities. To
provide high-quality blocks and heads at
the lowest possible cost, manufacturing
process engineers are required to find
increasingly innovative ways to cast and
heat treat components. Additionally, to remain competitive, products and manufacturing
methods must be developed and
implemented in record time. To bridge
the gaps between program needs and
engineering reality, the use of robust
computational models in up-front analysis
will take on an increasingly important
role. This article describes just such a
computational approach, the Virtual
Aluminum Castings methodology, which
was developed and implemented at Ford
Motor Company and demonstrates the
feasibility and benefits of integrated
computational materials engineering.
INTRODUCTION
Virtual Aluminum Castings (VAC) is a
revolutionary computer-aided engineering
(CAE) process that tightly couples
manufacturing and design analysis into
a holistic system to enable up-front
analysis. It demonstrates the capability
and benefits of the integrated computational
materials engineering (ICME)
paradigm discussed in this special edition
of JOM. Virtual Aluminum Castings is
a suite of integrated computational tools
that enables the rapid development of
durable, cost-effective cast aluminum
powertrain components. It is based on
advanced material models that bridge the
many key dimensional scales from the
atomistic level to the component level.
Using VAC, virtual components are now
designed, cast, heat treated, and tested for
durability on a workstation long before
components are fabricated. The development
of VAC is the culmination of
years of comprehensive research on cast
aluminum. It has been accomplished by
a combination of theoretical, experimental,
and computational technologies and
has involved the development of a deep,
fundamental understanding of dozens of
separate phenomena. This theoretical and
empirical knowledge has been captured
in a computationally efficient software
package within VAC.
Virtual Aluminum Castings is the
rare technological innovation that can be used to simultaneously reduce cost,
improve quality, save time, and reduce
weight. It is not asset intensive and
uses existing CAE infrastructures so
it costs relatively little to implement.
Virtual Aluminum Castings has been
successfully implemented within the
Ford powertrain design, manufacturing,
and CAE communities, significantly
reducing product development time and
saving Ford millions of dollars.
VIRTUAL ALUMINUM CASTINGS: USING THE ICME METHODOLOGY
The central objective of VAC is to
significantly reduce the time required to
develop and optimize new cast aluminum
components and casting/heat-treatment
processes. This objective is accomplished
by developing and validating
a computational capability with four
interdependent parts (Figure 1): the
accurate simulation of the thermal history
of an aluminum component through
casting and heat treatment, the prediction
of the microstructure that evolves
during these manufacturing processes at
all locations in a casting (i.e., the local
microstructure), the prediction of critical
local mechanical properties which
result from these local microstructures,
and coupling predicted local properties
and new damage and residual stress
models with finite element analysis
(FEA) methods to predict the durability
of engine components. Commercial
casting simulation software, specifically
MagmaSoft™ and ProCast™, and FEA
software, specifically ABAQUS™, provide
the basic framework for development
of these computational capabilities.
This methodology provides Ford with the
capability to quickly engineer low-cost,
durable aluminum castings.
The development of VAC required
activities in several key areas, specifically:
- Use of advanced materials models
to integrate analytical tools for
simulating the casting and heat treatment
processes with analysis
of component durability
- Linkage of fundamental models for
microstructural evolution with fundamental
models for property prediction
- Integration of fundamental knowledge
of phenomena occurring at a wide variety of length scales into
complete and coherent models
- Validation of the integrated models
- Incorporation of these software
tools into a simultaneous manufacturing
and product engineering
process, stressing computational
efficiency and having the right information
available at the right time
Not coincidentally, these areas also
comprise the key areas of the ICME
methodology described elsewhere.1
Figure 2 shows the key processing,
microstructure, and property knowledge
nodes required for cast aluminum alloys.
In developing the VAC tools, the focus
was as much on linking the models that
describe these individual knowledge
nodes as it was on the development of
the individual models themselves. The
interactions between these knowledge
areas and, in particular, the need to optimize
multiple properties as well as cost
constraints demonstrate the complexity
of this problem and thus the need to
conduct this optimization in an integrated
modeling environment.
One of the challenges in developing
VAC tools was to develop a predictive
approach capturing the influence
of the manufacturing process history
on the mechanical properties. This is
a significant challenge because these
models must account for metallurgical
phenomena that occur at vastly different
length and time scales (see Figure
3). For instance, solute diffusion and
precipitation in alloys is inherently an
atomistic process, but can manifest itself
via changes in macroscopic properties
(e.g., yield strength or thermal growth).
Hence, constructing properties models
in VAC requires the utilization and
linkage of modeling tools from the
atomistic scale, through nanostructure
and microstructural length scales, all
the way to the macroscopic dimensions,
as depicted in Figure 3. Metallurgical
features at each of these length scales
influence properties in a wide variety of
complex ways. Thus, it was necessary to
develop a fundamental and quantitative
understanding of the manner in which
specific properties were influenced by
specific metallurgical features acting
singularly or in combination. However,
to ensure computational efficiency it
was important to model only those
metallurgical processes and length scales
that are critical to the desired outcome.
Development of these models required a
unique mix of research expertise including
experimentalists and theoreticians
with extensive knowledge of numerical
modeling, metallurgy, physics, and
engineering mechanics.
Linking Manufacturing Process to Microstructure
Commercial software such as ProCAST and MagmaSoft has been used in
the past for casting process simulation;
however, its primary use has been for determining the castability of geometries.
These codes generally do not
predict the local microstructures that
evolve during casting and heat-treatment
processes nor do they predict local
mechanical properties resulting from
these local microstructures. For cast
aluminum, the key microstructural features
are microporosity, eutectic phases,
and precipitate phases.
To predict these local microstructural
features it is critical to first be able to
accurately predict thermal history during
casting and heat-treatment processes.
Commercial casting simulation codes
have limited success in predicting microstructure
in part due to limitations in
their heat-transfer coefficient databases.
For decades, researchers have attempted
to obtain heat-transfer coefficients for
different metal-mold interfaces and
processes experimentally, analytically,
or with inverse modeling approaches.
However, for a variety of reasons, it is
usually difficult to apply the interfacial
heat-transfer coefficients (IHTC) from
the literature directly. Chief among these
reasons are the dependence of the IHTC
on the casting geometry, detailed differences
in mold material, quench media,
and casting or quenching processes.
Therefore, a specialized optimization
routine was developed called OptCast,2
which couples MAGMAsoft or ProCast with an optimization program based on
an inverse modeling approach. OptCast enabled the development of accurate
IHTC for a wide variety of geometries,
casting processes, and heat treatment
(water quenching) processes. These
improved heat-transfer coefficients
substantially increase the accuracy of
thermal histories predicted by the casting
and heat-treatment simulations.
Prediction of microstructure and
micro-segregation during solidification
in a multi-component alloy is a crucial
step in understanding and simulating
mechanical properties and subsequent
in-service performance of cast components.
In 319-type aluminum alloys
(Al-Si-Cu), the eutectic θ or Al2Cu phase
is of particular interest because it affects
the subsequent evolution of the precipitation-
strengthening phase, θ′ (also
Al2Cu), during the aging process. During
solution treatment, these eutectic phases
slowly dissolve, so it is also important
to include this effect. A software tool
called MicroMod was developed to
couple solid-state diffusion, dendrite arm
coarsening, and dendrite-tip undercooling
directly with a commercial
multi-component phase diagram
(CALPHAD) computation tool, Pandat.
Results from phase transformation
kinetic models such as the commercial
tool, Dictra, were used for predicting
phase dissolution. MicroMod is capable
of predicting secondary dendrite arm
spacing and, more importantly, the
amount and type of the eutectic phases
that evolve during casting and the dissolution
of these phases during subsequent
thermal treatments.
At the nanoscale, accurately predicting
the amount and morphology of the
precipitation strengthening phase, θ′, is
critical. Similar to MicroMod, this precipitate
prediction requires an approach
that links different modeling techniques.
The resulting model, called NanoPPT,
was accomplished by linking first-principles
atomistic calculations based on
density functional theory for the calculation
of stable and metastable thermodynamic
functions, thermodynamic phase
equilibria calculations such as ThermoCalc or Pandat for phase stability, and
microstructural evolution models for
precipitate kinetics and morphology.3,4
The microstructural evolution models
were heavily dominated by empirically derived
relationships.6 Ongoing developments
are aimed at the incorporation of
a multiscale first-principles/phase-field
approach, developed to reliably predict
θ′ morphologies,6,7 thereby eliminating
one of the key empirical components of
the current version of NanoPPT.
Microporosity is a common microstructural
feature that can have a profound
influence on properties such as
fatigue. The VAC tool MicroPore, a
subroutine for commercial casting
simulation codes, uses the calculated
casting thermal histories to quantitatively
predict the relevant characteristics of
microporosity. It incorporates the complex,
non-linear physics of nucleation
and growth of pores. It models both the
macroscopic phenomena that control
microporosity, including fluid flow and
pressure variations in the melt, and the
microscopic phenomena, such as segregation
of the hydrogen/alloying elements,
to accurately predict the local
pore size.
Linking Microstructures to Mechanical Properties
As described, the ICME philosophy
was applied to develop the microstructural
evolution models in VAC by linking
models operating at different length
scales. It was also used in the development
of the models for prediction of
mechanical properties resulting from
these microstructures.
Yield Strength
The authors’ approach for modeling
the age-hardening yield-strength
behavior of cast Al-Si-Cu alloys utilizes
micromechanical models of precipitation
strengthening that connect key
microstructural parameters for realistic
precipitate morphologies (e.g., {100}
plates) with the age-hardening response.5
The microstructural parameters of
the strengthening θ′ plates measured
by transmission-electron microscopy
and a combined first-principles/computational-thermodynamics model of
θ′ volume fraction8,9 are used in the
micromechanical model to predict precipitation
strengthening, producing a
model that is completely free of fitting
parameters. This yield-strength model,
called LocalYS, is linked with microstructural
evolution models (MicroMod and NanoPPT) to produce a model of
the macroscopic, location-dependent
yield-strength behavior throughout the cast part.
Thermal Growth
In Al 319 castings aged for peak
strength (e.g., T6), a macroscopic, irreversible
dimensional change (termed
thermal growth) occurs during extended
high-temperature exposure.10 Hence,
heat-treatment schedules are often
devised in an effort to stabilize the casting
with respect to in-service dimensional
changes. The unique combination of
first-principles atomistic calculations,
computational thermodynamics, and
experimental measurements used to
construct NanoPPT was similarly used
to produce a model, called LocalTG, of
thermal growth in Al 319.4 The precipitation
of Al2Cu (θ′) is the major contributor
to thermal growth, and the model,
based on θ′ and θ evolution, provides
a quantitative and accurate predictor
of measured thermal growth. Like the yield-strength model, LocalTG was also
made possible only via a linkage with
the microstructural models, NanoPPT and MicroMod.3
As an illustrative example of the
integration of microstructural evolution,
length-scale information, and properties,
we examine the general expression for
thermal growth g(t,T). Growth is given
as a function of time and temperature4
as shown in Equation 1.
In this relationship, dVθ′ and dVθ are
the volume changes associated with
copper atoms going from solid solution to
precipitate phases θ and θ′, respectively.
These volume changes are determined
using first-principles atomic-scale
calculations. fθ and fθ' are the fractions
of copper involved in θ and θ' phases
as a function of time and temperature.
These quantities are determined from
NanoPPT using a unique combination
of first principles, CALPHAD, and
empiricism developed for the alloy in
question. The factor γ accounts for the
fraction of copper lost to eutectic θ phase
and is predicted from the solution treatment
dissolution model contained within
MicroMod.
Incorporating this thermal growth
model into a time- and temperature-dependent
swelling module within
ABAQUS enables the prediction not only
of the thermal growth that occurs in cast
aluminum engine blocks and heads as
a function of heat treatment and in-service
temperature and time, but also the
stresses that develop due to growth in
these parts. Combining these tools with
residual stress models produces a key
tool within the VAC suite for not only
process optimization of heat-treatment
times and temperatures, but also design
optimization of blocks and heads. Thus,
thermal growth provides an example
where important phenomena occur
on, and must be accurately modeled
on, scales ranging from Angstroms to
meters.
Fatigue Properties
Fatigue strength is one of the most
important properties impacting cast
aluminum engine components. The ability
to predict the influence of casting
history on the local fatigue strength is
therefore a key capability within the VAC
toolset. The authors’ local fatigue
strength model, LocalFS, is based on a
novel short-crack growth fatigue model11
that relates the size of micropores to the
high-cycle fatigue response. The local
pore-size characteristic predicted by the
microporosity model described is used,
in turn, to predict the local fatigue
strength in the critical regions. Figure 4
illustrates the procedural flow necessary
to calculate pore size with MicroPore for a casting component and link it to
the prediction of local fatigue properties.
Linking Material Properties to Performance Prediction
The material properties obtained are
integrated into engineering analysis by
another link: the coupling of material
properties to performance prediction, in
this case, durability. For that purpose,
another critical VAC component, the
prediction of residual stresses, was
required.
Residual Stress Analysis
The prediction of residual stresses in
complex castings represents a formidable
engineering challenge. The
residual stresses most concerned in VAC
are those formed during heat treatment
of cast aluminum cylinder heads and
blocks. The QuenchStress VAC module
was developed to predict residual stresses
due to casting and heat treatment.
Residual stresses in a heat-treated cast
aluminum engine component are mainly
introduced during the quench step following
the solution treatment. During
this treatment, the component is quickly
cooled from around 500°C to much lower
temperatures by immersing the component
in water, polymer quenchant, or
using forced air. The temperature gradient
from the surface to the interior of the
component leads to non-uniform thermal
expansion and non-uniform plastic
deformation and residual stresses. The
residual stresses generated during
quenching are relaxed partially during
the aging step of heat treatment. Any
attempt to predict residual stresses in a
heat-treated aluminum component thus
involves thermal analysis for the transient
temperature field during quenching and
stress analysis for both the quench and
aging steps.
The thermal analysis of forced air
quench processes can be handled reasonably
conveniently by commercial computational
fluid dynamics (CFD) codes.12
Water quenching is much more difficult
to simulate, as it involves the boiling and
vaporizing of water on metal surfaces.
Due to the limitations of current CFD
codes for solving this problem, an inverse
modeling approach was adopted using
the OptCast software. In this instance,
the heat-transfer problem is treated as a
boundary-value problem, using temperature-dependent IHTC on the metal
surface to represent the complicated
thermal activity between water and the
metal surface.13 The influence of geometrical
features within a component on
the IHTC is accounted for by dividing
the geometric surface into several groups.
A database of temperature-dependent
IHTCs is obtained for different water
and component conditions.
The key to success of a robust residual
stress analysis is the material constitutive
relation. The material response to loading
during the quench process is strongly
temperature- and strain-rate dependent.
Experimental measurements of stress
and strain relations were carried out at
isothermal conditions for various temperatures
and strain rates. These test data
were captured in a unified material relation.12,14 A computationally efficient,
user-defined material subroutine called
QuenchStress was developed to interface
the material relation with the commercial
finite-element code, ABAQUS.
Durability Prediction
Accurate durability prediction routines
requires the ability to predict the
material stress-strain response and
fatigue response during the complex
thermal mechanical cycling that occurs
in cylinder heads and blocks. For this
purpose, the HotStress subroutine was
developed. It is based on a unified viscoplastic
material relation14,15 and integrates
the results of the visco-plasticity
model with output from the previously
described local yield-strength model. It
also accounts for the impact of material
aging during both heat treatment and
engine operation.
The final module of the VAC toolset is a durability model, Hotlife, which
predicts how the component responds to
a wide variety of loading conditions.
These durability models12,15 have been
implemented into an ABAQUS postprocessor
using the VAC-predicted local
properties and residual stress models as
inputs. These durability models predict
the response of the structure to complex
high-cycle, low-cycle, and thermal mechanical-fatigue loading sequences.
Normally such durability models are
based on a database approach that
assumes an average material property
with no manufacturing influence on the
mechanical properties. The VAC tools
are unique in that they account for the
influence of the casting and heat-treat
process on the variation in local properties
as well as the local residual stresses
that are produced during the manufacturing
processes.
Model Validation and Integration into the Engineering Process
Despite the many benefits of a tool
such as VAC, convincing manufacturing
and product engineers to move
from a physical world to a virtual world
requires them to develop a strong sense
of confidence in the methodology. Thus,
an essential and integral step of VAC
tool development is the experimental
validation of these integrated models.
This step involved the development of
many novel experimental techniques for quantification of such factors as residual
stresses12,13 and component durability.16
It also required a comprehensive experimental
validation from castings manufactured
under a wide variety of casting
and heat-treatment process conditions.
Figure 5 shows a typical validation of the
local yield-strength model. An important
aspect of validation is determining, with
the target user, the range over which the
product may operate and an acceptable
degree of correlation. For the yield-strength
example shown in Figure 5,
the model predictions have an excellent
correlation with the experimental
measurements in the normal production
region and a reasonable correlation even
far beyond this region.
Another critical success factor was
the integration of the VAC toolset into
an efficient engineering methodology.
This was another challenging aspect of
the VAC development. Typically manufacturing
simulation is conducted after
performance modeling and is used to
ensure that a well-designed (from a
mechanical perspective) part can be
manufactured. For VAC to succeed, it
was necessary to reverse these procedures
(i.e., the manufacturing simulation
must come prior to prediction of the
engine component durability). Organizational
cultural changes were required
as well as development of timing plans
and procedures to ensure that critical
manufacturing information was available
earlier in the process than was previously
typical. To ensure that program timing
could either be met or accelerated
requires that these complex computations
can be completed efficiently and
that hand-offs between manufacturing
CAE and product (performance) CAE
are organized and efficient. To accomplish
this, substantial effort was expended
in the development of computationally
efficient, proprietary algorithms and
procedures as well as specialized software
linking the outputs of casting
simulations codes to FEA codes.
VIRTUAL ALUMINUM CASTINGS: EXAMPLES AND BENEFITS
The product creation process for cast
aluminum blocks and heads has traditionally
been the costly approach of design→build→test→redesign→build→retest.
Manufacturing analysis is traditionally
conducted after the design is complete.
Subtle manufacturing changes made late
in the product development process can
lead to engine durability problems and,
as a result, delays in launching new
products. By providing a holistic analysis
environment, VAC enables manufacturing
and product engineering to work
together simultaneously to solve these
problems long before components are
cast and engines tested. Examples of
how VAC has been used in process selection
and optimization and improved
component design criteria follow.
Manufacturing Process Selection and Optimization
Virtual Aluminum Castings provides
engineers a tool to explore different
manufacturing processes and then select
the most economical manufacturing
process that produces components that
meet the property requirements. One
example is the application of the prediction
of local fatigue properties in the
selection of a manufacturing process for
a cylinder head. In a demonstration of
the VAC capability, two different casting
processes were evaluated for fabricating
a cylinder head. Figure 6 shows the
comparison of local fatigue strength
predictions in the cylinder head produced
by the two different casting processes,
noted here as Process A and B (Figure
6a and b). It can be seen that the fatigue
strength in the valve bridge (a critical
region of cylinder head durability) was
higher using Process A, a lower-cost process, than that produced by Process
B. In addition to mapping local fatigue
strength and yield strength, residual
stresses could also be determined. By
carefully and simultaneously analyzing
all critical regions and properties, it could
be determined that casting Process A
provided improved product performance
at a substantially reduced cost.
Virtual Aluminum Castings also
provides a valuable tool to engineers for
optimizing the manufacturing process.
A hypothetical example is the use of the
local yield-strength model to optimize
the heat-treatment process for a cylinder
block. In this example, the property target
for the key bolt boss shown in Figure
7 was given to be 220 MPa. An initial
heat-treatment process for this block
included 5 h aging at 240°C. As shown
in Figure 7, the yield strength at this bolt
boss was predicted to be 210 MPa, which
is below the property target. Using VAC,
a new heat-treatment process, based on
aging for 3 h at 250°C, was predicted to
increase the yield strength to the desired
level. The optimized aging process not
only allows the component to meet the
property target, but also makes the process
faster by reducing the cycle time by
two hours.
Design Improvement and
Optimization
Another benefit of the VAC tools is
the opportunity for design improvement
and optimization made possible by
the improvement in durability predictions.
These predictions are improved
specifically by the incorporation of two
key factors currently missing from other
durability predictions: property predictions
that are dependent on the location
through the cast part and sensitive to
manufacturing history, and the incorporation
of residual stresses.
One example of the way VAC tools
led to a design improvement is illustrated
by the ability to predict the spatial
variation in fatigue properties and the
influence of the casting process on these
location-dependent properties. The use
of these local properties is vastly superior
to the use of average or nominal properties
in calculations. As shown in Figure
6, the fatigue properties in complex cast
components can vary by 30–40%. The
use of a nominal property on the upper
end of this range in fatigue calculations
would result in an overly optimistic
calculated life and the potential for a
component that does not pass the engine durability
phase of the product development
cycle. This could require a change
in the geometry or the casting process
resulting in costly and time-consuming
iterative rework of the casting tooling.
In contrast, use of a nominal fatigue
property on the low end of this range could lead to an overly conservative
design. While this would be a durable
design, it would be a heavier and thus
more costly design than required to meet
the design intent of the component. In
contrast, the use of the VAC-predicted
local fatigue properties leads to an accurate
understanding of the influence of
casting on local properties and this
enables a more robust durability prediction.
The use of VAC tools also provides
a capability for putting the right properties
where they are needed throughout
the component. This capability leads to
substantial improvements in product
development timing and an optimum
(e.g., lightweight and low-cost) design.
Residual stresses can also play an
important role in determining the durability
of engineering components. By
influencing the mean stresses during
high-cycle fatigue events, residual
stresses can radically influence the
fatigue resistance of a component. However,
due to the difficulty in calculating
these residual stresses, they are often
simply excluded from durability design
calculations. Figure 8 compares life
predictions made with and without
residual stress for a hypothetical cast
aluminum cylinder head. Without
accounting for residual stresses, the
predicted life of this cylinder head is
over 107 cycles, a typical design life for
a cylinder head. However, when the
residual stresses calculated using the
VAC tools are included, the predicted
life of the head would be an order of
magnitude less, thus necessitating design
changes. Virtual Aluminum Castings
tools offer a capability to quantify and
account for this life-limiting factor long
before components are cast and assembled
into a running engine.
Benefits
The VAC methodology has been used
for the development of a multitude of
engine programs at Ford and has demonstrated
a number of important benefits.
It provides a common tool for use by the
global Ford powertrain CAE community
and captures a comprehensive knowledge
in casting technology, product
design, metallurgy, physics, and mechanics
of cast aluminum alloys. A key
benefit is a 15–25% reduction in the time
it takes to develop a new cylinder head
or block. This was accomplished by
minimizing or eliminating costly and
time-consuming iterations, the need for
which would previously have been discovered
only during engine testing.
Although engine durability testing
remains a key requirement of the design
verification, the use of VAC has enabled
cost savings by reducing the number of
specialized component tests required to
assure product durability. In addition to
cost savings resulting from an improved
product and process development process,
the VAC tools have been used to
optimize the key economic aspects of a
casting or heat-treatment process (e.g.,
cycle time) while ensuring that the component
is manufacturable and that component
durability and quality are not
compromised. Since its inception it is
estimated that the use of VAC tools has
saved Ford millions of dollars in direct
cost savings or cost avoidance.
CONCLUSION
The benefits demonstrated by the VAC
methodology are offered as proof that
the promise of ICME can be realized in
practice. Linking manufacturing, materials,
and design in a holistic CAE
environment has resulted in a tool with
unsurpassed capabilities. Ford is currently
extending this technology to
high-pressure die castings, a new process
for Ford aluminum engine blocks and
magnesium castings. The fundamental
framework of VAC can be transferred to
the development of similar technologies
for non-powertrain (e.g., body and chassis)
cast aluminum components in a
straightforward manner. The ICME
concept is also under investigation to
determine its applicability to areas ranging
from sheet metal to plastics and to
paints. The ability to integrate manufacturing
processes and component design
through advanced materials models has
much promise and is in its infancy.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors acknowledge the considerable
efforts and accomplishments of
members of the Virtual Aluminum Castings
team within Ford Research and
Advanced Engineering and Ford Powertrain
Operations. We also acknowledge
the efforts and accomplishments of
researchers at the University of Michigan,
University of Illinois, Imperial
College, Pennsylvania State University,
and the University of Southern California–Los Angeles with whom we have
collaborated in developing the fundamental
knowledge base that enabled VAC.
REFERENCES
1. John Allison, D. Backman, and L. Christodoulou,
JOM, in this issue.
2. Mei Li and John Allison, Simulation of Aluminum
Casting Process: From Alloy Design to Mechanical
Properties, ed. Qigui Wang et al. (Warrendale, PA:
TMS, 2006), p. 91.
3. M. Li et al., Metallurgical Modeling for Aluminum
Alloys, ed. M. Tiryakioglu and L. Lalli (Materials Park,
OH: ASM International, 2003), p. 79.
4. C. Wolverton and J. Allison, U.S. patent 6,858,103 (2005).
5. S. Weakley et al., Met. and Matls. Trans. A, 35A (2004), p. 2407.
6. V. Vaithyanathan, C. Wolverton, and L.-Q. Chen, Acta
Mater., 52 (2004), p. 2973.
7. V. Vaithyanathan, C. Wolverton, and L.-Q. Chen,
Phys. Rev. Lett., 88 (2002), p. 125503.
8. C. Wolverton et al., Acta Mater., 50 (2002), p. 2187.
9. C. Wolverton and V. Ozolins, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 (2001), p. 5518.
10. J. Boileau et al., SAE Paper 2003-01-0657 (Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2003).
11. M. Caton, J. Jones, and J. Allison, Fatigue Crack
Growth Thresholds, Endurance Limits and Design,
ASTM STP 1372, ed. J.C. Newman and R.S. Piascik
(West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2000).
12. Xuming Su et al., “Thermal and Residual Stress
Analysis for Engine Block with Cast-in Liners”
(Presentation at the ASM Material Solution and
Exhibition, Pittsburgh, PA, 15–17 October 2003).
13. Ulrich Weiss et al., Proceedings of Haus der
Technik (Essen, Germany: House of Technology, 2003).
14. H. Sehitoglu et al., Met. and Matls. Trans. A, 20A (1989), p. 1755.
15. X. Su et al., SAE Paper 2002-01-0657 (Warrendale,
PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2002).
16. J. Lasecki, X. Su, and J. Allison, SAE Paper 2006-
01-0324 (Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive
Engineers, 2006).
John Allison is senior technical leader, Mei Li is
technical expert, and C. Wolverton and XuMing
Su are technical leaders, all at Ford Motor
Company in Dearborn, Michigan.
For more information, contact John Allison, Ford
Motor Company, MD 3182, Research and Innovation
Center, Dearborn, MI 48124; (313) 845-7224; fax
(313) 323-1129, e-mail jalliso2@ford.com.
|