It starts with a push.
Propelled by the strength and collective
will of four powerful sprinters
gripping its sides, an Olympic bobsled
launches from a frozen start ramp, accelerating
from a standstill to 40 kilometers
an hour in less than five seconds. At
about 50 meters into the race, the team
hops into the sled one by one, with the
pilot already preparing to hit the first of
16 turns built into the ice-encased track
of the Whistler Sliding Centre, site of
the bobsleigh competitions for the 2010
Vancouver Winter Olympics.
Like a fiberglass bullet, the sled shoots down a
vertical drop of 152 meters, subjecting
its crew to crushing G-force and bruising
jolts around the curves, while attaining
speeds of nearly 150 kilometers
an hour. Victory at the end is measured
in hundredths of a second, with almost
imperceptible factors deciding the difference
between a medal run and a disappointing
finish.
For the 2010 Olympics, the Swiss
Bobsleigh Federation (SBSV) wanted
to make sure that those factors had
nearly nothing to do with the construction
of the sled. Under the project name
CITIUS—which echoes the Olympic
motto, “Citius, Altius, Fortius (faster,
higher, stronger)—SBSV marshaled
the talents and resources of the Swiss
Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), a consortium of industrial partners,
and current and former bobsleigh
athletes to work on “building a better
bob” (Figure 1).
THE SCIENCE OF THE SLED
“An initial question we asked ourselves
was ‘what slows down a bobsled?’”
said Ulrich Suter, professor in
ETH Zurich’s Department of Materials
and CITIUS project coordinator. “After
a careful analysis, we decided to break
the problem into a number of simpler
tasks. Aerodynamics is clearly important,
especially in the very fast track
at Whistler. The shape and surface
structure of the runners are also very
relevant. The hull and chassis materials,
as well as the dynamics within the
system, play a crucial role in the mechanical
dissipation of energy in the
bobsled. And, above all, safety is paramount—
the sled must survive a crash
at full speed and protect the crew. We
numerically simulated all key aspects
of the sleds and tried to isolate the most
important factors, and then experimentally
tested our assumptions to optimize
the design.”
A particular challenge for CITIUS
was developing a state-of-the-art bobsled
in accordance with the rules for
construction and design enforced by
the Fédération Internationale de Bobsleigh
et de Tobogganing (FIBT), the
governing organization for competitive
bobsledding. The runners, for instance,
have to be constructed from a rigidly defined steel procured from a prescribed
source, with any type of modifying
treatments “forbidden, including those
which even cause only a local variation
of the physical characteristics and/or
of the composition and/or structure of
the material.” Steels used elsewhere on
the sled are more generally described
as “an alloy of iron and carbon with an
iron content of more than 50 percent,”
while “rubber or rubber-like material”
can be incorporated into the sled for the
purpose of damping vibrations. Hulls
have no prescribed material at all. Suter
said he was surprised, actually, at “how
many unspecified areas were left in a
seemingly very complete—some might
say overly complete—book of rules.”
"Our simulations indicated that several apparent inefficiencies of the sleds might be avoided with an appropriate choice of materials" |
Working within these parameters, a
team of more than 20 ETH Zurich scientists
and engineers from a wide range
of disciplines applied their specific expertise
to different aspects of the CITIUS
bobsled. A battery of tests revealed
the sources and nature of vibrations,
which forces were exerted where
on the chassis, and the specific stiffness
and strength of certain materials.
“Our
simulations indicated that several apparent
inefficiencies of the sleds might
be avoided with an appropriate choice
of materials,” said Suter. “However,
almost all standard elastomeric materials
were inadequate to the demands of
the sport. And, many tested adhesives
proved insufficient under the (dynamic)
mechanical and thermal stresses of
bobsled racing.”
To address these issues, the research
team created elastomeric damping
materials specifically for the CITIUS,
while also developing a composite hull
strengthened with long-fiber reinforcement.
Once the components were assembled
into prototype sleds, athletes
from the SBSV tested the CITIUS in
the wind tunnel at the Audi works in
Ingolstadt, Germany (Figure 2).
The
real moment of truth for the project occurred
when, bristling with sensors to
measure forces, driving dynamics, and
aerodynamic properties, the CITIUS
hurtled down an ice track for the first
time near Innsbruck, Austria. Although
highly guarded about revealing details
of the CITIUS’ development and
performance, the research team was
pleased with the results, according to
the CITIUS Dossier posted on the ETH
Zurich Web site.
A WEIGHTY MATTER
Whether smoothing the performance
of a bobsled careening down the Whistler
ice track, or giving an aerials skier
an extra bounce into the Canadian sky,
advanced materials technologies like
those used in the CITIUS project will
be on prominent display at this year’s
Winter Olympics. The quest for a competitive
edge through advancements in
engineering isn’t limited to these elite
athletes, however. Said Travis Downing,
a materials engineer in research and
development at Easton Hockey, California,
“Once full composite hockey
sticks were introduced onto the market
about ten years ago, they immediately
became the ‘must have’ stick among
professional players. Subsequently,
amateur players were quick to jump
on that trend, as well. The fact that it
is nearly impossible to find a wooden
hockey stick anymore speaks volumes
to the adoption rate of composite sticks”
(Figure 3).
A key advantage of composite
hockey sticks over wooden ones, said
Downing, is weight. Wooden sticks
routinely tip the scales at more than
650 grams, while modern composite
sticks can be as low as 400 grams. By
being lighter, composite sticks are
easier to control and provide for greater
swing velocity. Downing said that
composite hockey sticks have also
been found to be superior to wooden
ones in storing and rapidly releasing
strain energy, which enables players
to boost their shot velocity. From a
manufacturing standpoint, composites
make it possible to reproduce a hockey
stick’s properties exactly each time,
while the organic nature of wood tends
to introduce inconsistencies from stick
to stick (Figure 4).
“For most sports, lowering the
weight of the equipment without reducing performance is highly desirable,”
said Katharine Flores, an associate
professor at Ohio State University
and TMS member who was tapped by
NBC to contribute to its Science of the
Olympic Winter Games educational
series. “This can be addressed both
by improved materials and improved
processing technologies. Beyond
that, the design really depends on the
sport. With skis, for instance, the most
important consideration is probably
stiffness. If the ski deflects or twists
a lot, that steals kinetic energy—and
speed—from the skier” (Figure 5).
“Perhaps the most interesting
thing about sports equipment is what
doesn’t drive change—cost,” Flores
continued. “Even recreational users
are willing to pay more for perceived
improvements in performance.”
Many of the advancements in sporting
equipment owe their origins to the
aerospace industry, particularly in the
application of composites and lightweight
alloys. Said Downing, “The
entire sports equipment spectrum—
from baseball and softball bats, to tennis
rackets, to golf shafts, to bicycle
and motorsports structures—uses essentially
the same carbon fiber and
two-part epoxy that was originally developed
for military and aerospace applications.”
"Because hockey is such a fast-paced
sport with frequent collisions, it
becomes crucial to have the proper balance
of performance and durability in
a stick" |
Even with space age technology,
the quest for optimum performance in
sporting equipment can be challenging.
“Because hockey is such a fast-paced
sport with frequent collisions, it
becomes crucial to have the proper balance
of performance and durability in
a stick,” said Downing. “The unfortunate
reality is those factors are largely
in opposition to one another, given the
desire to maintain the lightest structure
possible. Composite suppliers tend to
address the problem by adjusting the
epoxy formulation, with variation in
fiber properties also factoring into the
equation through alteration of tensile
modulus, strength, and elongation to
failure.”
TECHNOLOGY VS. TECHNIQUE
The next big advancement in sports
materials technology may be launched
by the power of small. Easton-Bell Sports, of which Easton Hockey is
part, has already had initial success
adding functionalized multi-wall carbon
nanotubes (CNTs) to strengthen
epoxy resin for bat, bicycle, and hockey
applications. “It has been difficult
to realize the full promise that singlewall
CNTs has shown in the lab, because
the processing technology needed
to exploit their full potential has not
reached maturity,” said Downing. “The
next few years, however, will see additional
leaps forward in nanostructured
composites for sports applications.”
As exciting and anticipated as these
potential advancements may be, Flores
noted that concerns about technology
overshadowing technique in the elite
sports world beg to be addressed, fueled
by such recent controversies as
the Speedo® LZR Racer™ suit worn
by Michael Phelps in the 2008 Beijing
Olympics.
“There are some important ethical
considerations at work in the use of advanced
materials and technological advancements
in general,” she said. “The
Olympics, in particular, are supposed
to be about reaching for the pinnacle of
human athletic achievement, with ‘human’
being the operative word. A lot
of people feel that it really shouldn’t
be about who has the latest and greatest
gadget. There is a fine line between
engineering the equipment to highlight
the capabilities of the athlete—freeing
him or her from various physical constraints—
and engineering the equipment
to artificially improve the performance
of the athlete.
“For the recreational athlete, however,
I think these ethical considerations
go away,” she continued. “There’s
nothing wrong with making equipment
that improves the performance and, as
a result, the experience of recreational
players so they will enjoy the game
more and stick with it.”
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
JOM would like to acknowledge
Francis H. (Sam) Froes, retired director
and department head, Materials
Science and Engineering Department,
University of Idaho, and TMS member
for the insights and background information
he contributed to this article.
Lynne Robinson is a news and feature writer with TMS.
|