53 (4) (2001), pp. 14-17. |
---|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
|
From the onset of the space era, both organic-matrix and metal-matrix composites (MMCs), with high specific stiffness and near-zero coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), have been developed for space applications. Of the organic-matrix composites, graphite/epoxy (Gr/Ep) has been used in space for truss elements, bus panels, antennas, wave guides, and parabolic reflectors in the past 30 years. MMCs possess high-temperature capability, high thermal conductivity, low CTE, and high specific stiffness and strength. Those potential benefits generated optimism for MMCs for critical space system applications in the late 1980s.1,2 The purpose of this article is to detail the history, status, and opportunities of MMCs for space applications.
The extreme environment in space presents both a challenge
and opportunity for material scientists. In the near-earth orbit, typical spacecraft
encounter naturally occurring phenomena such as vacuum, thermal radiation, atomic
oxygen, ionizing radiation, and plasma, along with factors such as micrometeoroids
and human-made debris. For example, the International
Space Station, during its 30-year life, will undergo about 175,000 thermal
cycles from +125°C to –125°C as it moves in and out of the Earth’s shadow. Re-entry
vehicles for Earth and Mars missions may encounter temperatures that exceed
1,500°C. Critical spacecraft missions, therefore, demand lightweight space structures
with high pointing accuracy and dimensional stability in the presence of dynamic
and thermal disturbances. Composite materials, with their high specific stiffness
and low coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), provide the necessary characteristics
to produce lightweight and dimensionally stable structures. Therefore, both
organic-matrix and metal-matrix composites (MMCs) have been developed for space
applications.
Despite the successful production of MMCs such as continuous-fiber reinforced
boron/aluminum (B/Al), graphite/ aluminum (Gr/Al), and graphite/ magnesium (Gr/Mg),3–7
the technology insertion was limited by the concerns related to ease of manufacturing
and inspection, scale-up, and cost. Organic-matrix composites continued to successfully
address the system-level concerns related to microcracking during thermal cycling
and radiation exposure, and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding; MMCs
are inherently resistant to those factors. Concurrently, discontinuously reinforced
MMCs such as silicon-carbide particulate (p) reinforced aluminum (SiCp/Al)
and Gp/Al composites were developed cost effectively
both for aerospace applications (e.g., electronic packaging) and commercial
applications. This paper describes the benefits, drawbacks, potential for the
various MMCs in the U.S. space program.
Historically, MMCs, such as steel-wire reinforced copper, were among the first continuous-fiber reinforced composites studied as a model system. Initial work in late 1960s was stimulated by the high-performance needs of the aerospace industry. In these development efforts, performance, not cost, was the primary driver. Boron filament, the first high-strength, high-modulus reinforcement, was developed both for metal- and organic- matrix composites. Because of the fiber-strength degradation and poor wettability in molten-aluminum alloys, the early carbon fibers could only be properly reinforced in organic-matrix composites. Therefore, the development of MMCs was primarily directed toward diffusion-bonding processing. At the same time, optimum (air stable) surface coatings were developed for boron and graphite fibers to facilitate wetting and inhibit reaction with aluminum or magnesium alloys during processing.
Table I. Material Properties of Unidrectional Metal-Matrix Composites for Space Applications |
|||
Properties
|
P100/6061 Al
(0°) |
P100/AZ91C Mg
( 0°) |
Boron/Al
( 0°) |
|
|
|
|
Volume Percent Reinforcement
|
42.2
|
43
|
50
|
Density, r (gm/cm3)
|
2.5
|
1.97
|
2.7
|
Poisson Ratio nxy
|
0.295
|
0.3
|
0.23
|
Specific Heat Cp
(J/kg-K)
|
812
|
795
|
801
|
Longitudinal
|
|||
Young’s Modulus (x) (GPa)
|
342.5
|
323.8
|
235
|
Ultimate Tensile Strength (x) (MPa) |
905
|
710.0
|
1100
|
Thermal Conductivity Kx (W/m-K) |
320.0
|
189
|
|
CTEx (10-6 /K*) |
-0.49
|
0.54
|
5.8
|
Transverse | |||
Young’s Modulus (y) (GPa) |
35.4
|
20.7
|
138
|
Ultimate Tensile Strength (y) (MPa) |
25.0
|
22.0
|
110
|
Thermal Conductivity Ky
(W/m-K)
|
72.0
|
32.0
|
|
* Slope of a line joining extreme points (at –100°C and +100°C) of the thermal strain curve (first cycle). |
Table II lists the properties of discontinuously
reinforced aluminum (DRA) composites for spacecraft and commercial applications.
DRA is an isotropic MMC with specific mechanical properties superior to conventional
aerospace materials. For example, DWA Aluminum Composites has produced MMCs
using 6092 and 2009 matrix alloys for the best combination of strength, ductility,
and fracture toughness, and 6063 matrix alloy to obtain high thermal conductivity.
Similarly, Metal Matrix Cast Composite (MMCC) Inc. has produced graphite particulate-reinforced
aluminum composites for the optimum combination of high specific thermal conductivity
and CTE.
Table II. Material Properties of Discontinuously Reinforced Aluminum-Matrix Composites |
|||
Properties
|
Graphite Al
GA 7-230 |
Al6092/SiC/17.5p
|
Al/SiC/63p
|
|
|
|
|
Density, r (gm/cm3)
|
2.45
|
2.8
|
3.01
|
Young’s Modulus (GPa)
|
88.7
|
100
|
220
|
Compressive Yield Strength (MPa)
|
109.6
|
406.5
|
|
Tensile Ultimate Strength (MPa)
|
76.8
|
461.6
|
253
|
Compressive Ultimate Strength (MPa)
|
202.6
|
|
|
CTE (x-y) (10-6
/K)
|
6.5-9.5
|
16.4
|
7.9
|
Thermal Conductivity (W/m-K) (x-y) |
190
|
165
|
175
|
(z) |
150
|
170
|
|
Electrical Resistivity (m-ohm-cm) |
6.89
|
|
|
|
While the desire for high-precision, dimensionally stable spacecraft structures has driven the development of MMCs, applications thus far have been limited by difficult fabrication processes. The first successful application of continuous-fiber reinforced MMC has been the application of B/Al tubular struts used as the frame and rib truss members in the mid-fuselage section, and as the landing gear drag link of the Space Shuttle Orbiter (Figure 1). Several hundred B/Al tube assemblies with titanium collars and end fittings were produced for each shuttle orbiter. In this application, the B/Al tubes provided 45% weight savings over the baseline aluminum design.
|
|
|||
Figure 1. Mid-fuselage structure of Space Shuttle Orbiter showing boron-aluminum tubes. (Photo courtesy of U.S. Air Force/NASA). |
Figure 2. The P100/6061 Al high-gain antenna wave guides/ boom for the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) shown (a-left) before integration in the HST, and (b-right) on the HST as it is deployed in low-earth orbit from the space shuttle orbiter. |
|||
|
|
The major application of Gr/Al composite is a high-gain antenna boom (Figures
2a and 2b)
for the Hubble Space Telescope
made with diffusion-bonded sheet of P100 graphite fibers in 6061 Al. This boom
(3.6 m long) offers the desired stiffness and low CTE to maintain the position
of the antenna during space maneuvers. In addition, it provides the wave-guide
function, with the MMC’s excellent electrical conductivity enabling electrical-signal
transmission between the spacecraft and the antenna dish. Also contributing
to its success in this function is the MMC’s high dimensional stability—the
material maintains internal dimensional tolerance of ±0.15 mm along the entire
length. While the part currently in service is continuously reinforced with
graphite fibers, replacement structures produced with less expensive DRA have
been certified.
Like the Gr/Al structural boom, a few MMCs have been designed to serve multiple
purposes, such as structural, electrical, and thermal-control functions. For
example, prototype Gr/Al composites were developed as structural radiators to
perform structural, thermal, and EMI-shielding functions.5
Also, Gr/Cu MMCs with high thermal conductivity were developed for high-temperature
structural radiators.6
A DRA panel is used as a heat sink between two printed circuit boards to provide
both thermal management and protection against flexure and vibration, which
could lead to premature failure of the components in the circuit board.
In technology-development programs sponsored by the U.S.
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the U.S.
Air Force, graphite/magnesium tubes for truss-structure applications have
been successfully produced (jointly by Lockheed
Martin Space Systems of Colorado and Fiber Materials of Maine) by the filament-winding
vacuum-assisted casting process. Figures 3a
and 3b show a few of the cast Gr/Mg
tubes (50 mm dia ´ 1.2 m long) that were produced
to demonstrate the reproducibility and reliability of the fabrication method.
Of the DRA composites, reinforcements of both particulate SiCp/Al
and whisker (w) SiCw/Al were extensively characterized
and evaluated during the 1980s. Potential applications included joints and attachment
fittings for truss structures, longerons, electronic packages, thermal planes,
mechanism housings, and bushings. Figures 4a
and 4b show a multi-inlet SiCp/Al
truss node produced by a near net-shape casting process.
|
|
Figure 5. Discontinuously reinforced aluminum MMCs for electronic packaging applications: (a-top) SiCp/Al electronic package for a remote power controller (photo courtesy of Lockheed Martin Corporation), and (b-bottom) cast Grp/Al components (photo courtesy of MMCC, Inc.). |
Because of their combination of high thermal conductivity, tailorable CTE (to match the CTE of electronic materials such as gallium arsenide or alumina), and low density, DRA composites are especially advantageous for electronic packaging and thermal-management applications.8,9 Several SiCp/Al and Grp/Al (Figures 5a and 5b) electronic packages have been space-qualified and are now flown on communication satellites and Global Positioning System satellites. These components are not only significantly lighter than those produced from previous metal alloys, but they provide significant cost savings through net-shape manufacturing.9 DRA is also used for thermal management of spacecraft power semiconductor modules in geosynchronous earth-orbit communication satellites, displacing Cu/W alloys with a much higher density and lower thermal conductivity, while generating a weight savings of more than 80%. These modules are also used in a number of land-based systems, which accounts for an annual production near 1 million piece-parts. With these demonstrated benefits, application of DRA MMCs for electronic packages will continue to flourish for space applications.
1. Jerry G.
Baetz, “Metal Matrix Composites: Their Time Has Come,” Aerospace America
(November 1998), pp. 14–16.
2. W.S. Johnson, “Metal Matrix
Composites: Their Time to Shine?,” ASTM
Standardization News (October 1987), pp. 36– 39.
3. D.R. Tenny, G.F. Sykes, and
D.E. Bowles, “Composite Materials for Space Structures,” Proc. Third European
Symp. Spacecraft Materials in Space Environment, ESA SP-232 (Noordwijk,
Netherlands: European Space Agency, October 1985), pp. 9–21.
4. M.E. Buck and R.J. Suplinskas,
“Continuous Boron Fiber MMC’s,” Engineered Metal Handbook, Vol. 1 (Materials
Park, OH: ASM, 1987),
pp. 851–857.
5. D.M. Goddard, P.D. Burke,
and D.E. Kizer, “Continuous Graphite Fiber MMC’s,” Engineered Materials Handbook,
Vol. 1 (Materials Park, OH: ASM,
1987), p. 867.
6. A.J. Juhasz and G.P. Peterson,
Review of Advanced Radiator Technologies for Spacecraft Power Systems and
Space Thermal Control, NASA TP-4555 (1994).
7. S.P. Rawal and M.S. Misra,
“Dimensional Stability of Cast Gr-Mg Composites,” 19th International SAMPE
Conference (Covina, CA: SAMPE,
October 1987), pp. 134–147.
8. C. Thaw et al., “Metal Matrix
Composites for Microwave Packaging Components,” Electronic
Packaging and Production (August 1987), pp. 27–29.
9. D.B. Miracle and B. Maruyama,
“Metal Matrix Composites for Space Systems: Current Uses and Future Opportunities,”
Proc. National Space and Missile Materials Symp., ed. M. Stropki (Dayton,
OH: Anteon Corp., 2000).
10. C.C. Carlson, “Polymer
Composites: Adjusting the Commercial Marketplace,” JOM,
45 (8) (1993), pp. 56–57.
Suraj P. Rawal is Manager of Advanced Structures and Materials and Thermal Control Group at Lockheed Martin Space Systems–Astronautics Operations, Denver, CO.
For more information, contact S.P. Rawal, Lockheed Martin Space
Systems–Aeronautics Operations, Advanced Structures and Materials and Thermal
Control Group, Denver, Colorado.
Direct questions about this or any other JOM page to jom@tms.org.
If you would like to comment on the April
2001 issue of JOM,
simply complete the JOM on-line critique form |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Search | TMS Document Center | Subscriptions | Other Hypertext Articles | JOM | TMS OnLine |